Hi Toymaker, Yes there are a few answers. But these are my knowledge, and a proper burner engineer may have better answers. It does look like you have good atomisation, but I think you need more air within the cloud. (The mixture ratio is too rich).
My SIMPLE understanding is as below: (I say simple, because I am NOT a combustion engineer, just picked-up a few bits on the way, and I am probably incorrect in some of this?!)
The initial Fuel air mix must be heated to a point where the hydrocarbons begin to breakdown into ions, so the fuel ions (carbon, Hydrogen, and simple paraffins, butanes, etc.) can combine with the O2 => Oxygen ions from the air. So, because of the mix of Oxygen and Nitrogen making-up air, and the natural combinations of carbon and hydrogen in the hydrocarbons we are burning, you need about 15 times more air than fuel to balance most of the fuels we are burning here.
In flames, the hydrogen ignites and burns first, as it is so reactive, elevating the fuel and ionised gas temperature of the "Mass" of the mixture. This can be initiated in a small local zone by a spark (electrical, flint, iron, or whatever!), where the "gas temperature" to make the first ions to start the combustion is a few thousand degrees C. Once initiated, the heat released from the first few burning ions rapidly ionises the rest of the mixture nearby until a sustainable flame occurs. The heat at the flame front: where fresh mixture meets the combustion zone, keeps ionising more fuel which mixes with ionised O2 from the air to permit more combustion. This is my "simple layman's model of the flame.
When the hydrogen has been ripped off some molecules of fuel, the carbon ions mixing with Oxygen ions combust around 500degrees C or higher (?) forming CO. But there can be free carbon that is "quite big" relatively in molecular/ion size within the fuel gas mix, if there is insufficient air (oxygen) in this initial mix of fuel and air. This free carbon must be heated to glowing (over 700 degrees C?) with more air in order to burn to CO.
In a third phase, all the remaining CO and C burns with the remaining air (a darker blue flame, tinged with yellow or orange where there is free carbon). But as the flame is rapidly expanding, and, because of gas laws, that means cooling, when the temperature drops below around 700degrees C the carbon stops burning (leaving free soot), and when it drops below about 350 degrees C the CO stops burning.
A crazy thing I found is that when I get enough air into the mixture initially, the flames get smaller and more compact (actually are hotter as they burn faster). When you reach a stage close to "good" complete combustion, the "yellow feathers" reduce to an orange glow in the flame, and then disappear leaving just the 2 blue Bunsen cones we are familiar with.
So I still think you need MORE air in the jet nozzle.
I.E. use a smaller fuel jet and a higher air pressure, until you get a better mixture here.
You are pumping 14L of fuel per hour through the jet: This is 14 x 0.8 /60 = 187gms of fuel per minute.
Which means you need 15 x 187 = 2.8 kg. of air per min. = 6.172lbs of air per min.
Dry air at 0�C has a density of 12.417423770565761 cubic feet per pound. So you need 76.65CFM at atmospheric pressure. At 100 psi from your compressor, that equates to 9.82cfm.
What pressure are you delivering at the jet? What air flow rate do you have at the jet?
When we understand the Mixture is correct, then we can tackle any "flame dynamics" to resolve any issues. But I think your blower and nozzle outer giving the swirl pattern is probably good.
An idea: Can you fit a jet of maybe 3/4 the diameter (size) of your jet, and increase the air pressure to 1 1/2 times the current pressure? Then let us see what that does?
If my help is "no help", just tell me to stop. I am no expert, just a meddler in this subject.
K2
I found this... maybe it relates to your spray nozzle?
I noted you use 8psi... but this uses 3 bar = 45psi. That's a LOT more air!
For the fuel flow you want, the jet is 2mm - What size is yours?
K2
Sounds like you have solved your problem. The Iast check I would do, is see if the Room CO Monitor I keep in my garage would sound in the exhaust. I found one of my burners, that otherwise looked OK, was chuffing out loads of invisble, toxic gas, as just a few minutes in an open garage and it sounded. About as bad as my 1979 Moto Guzzi!
I reckon it was a " half hour to unconsciousness" rating, but explained my headache. That burner was retuned with a smaller gas jet and is clean, although lower gas power.
Keep safe, that's a big burner!
K2
Hi Toymaker, now you have introduced a different variable. The nozzle designed for waste fuel will pass much more kerosene, as it has a lower viscosity, so you need to reduce the fuel jet size! If you plan on 14l per hour (max) of waste oil as the rating of the jet at a certain air pressure, then you will be probably pumping at least twice that with kerosene?
I shall try and find a simple ratio to give you a suitable jet size to try?
Design is simple, but you do need to do the math to get it right.
K2
Ok. So it won't pump the same kerosene as the spec for water. But it will pump typically 5 x more kerosene than oil, for the SAME air. So if it was designed for waste oil, it will be very rich on kerosene.
A simple rule of life is that anything designed for one material, is unlikely to be right for another material. So it needs retuning.
E.g. My 1970s motor cycle is not happy with today's petrol and needed tuning, as petrol is not like it used to be.
I hope some of this is of some help?
K2
Hi Toymaker, Appreciate the comments, but my point is that for the "best" combustion, balancing the fuel and air correctly at the nozzle gives the best mix for full combustion without excess air. External air gives a lot of extra expansion and loss of temperature (Boyles law? PV/T = R) to the gases, which in turn is a loss of efficiency in the boiler/furnace where high temperature heat exchange to a medium other than the air is wanted: (but not in a Space heater, where all you want is "hot air"..)...
Cheers.
K2
Quite a simple device, a needle jet. Where the air whistles past the jet, developing the low pressure to withdraw the fuel and do the atomising. But at low pressure air the jet has a needle blocking most of the jet, whereas at high pressure air when more fuel is sucked from the jet, the needle (tapered) is partly withdrawn to permit higher fuel flow.
K2
In post #9 you mention that you will be supplying air from a compressor, driven by the steam turbine. Will this be variable pressure to drive the fuel jet? Or will you use a regulator or something from your small compressor? You obviously have some boiler firing control planned that I don't appreciate yet. Maybe a needle in the jet will be an adequate control on its own? Try it and see?
K2
Enter your email address to join: