The Offy's exhaust ports are connected to the collector through 5/8" diameter stainless steel tubes. A drawing in the manual shows these tubes being derived from 90 degree bends formed on a 2" radius. This is a pretty tight radius for 5/8" hard tubing, and even though my tube/pipe bender has a 5/8" die, its bend radius is 3". The difference didn't seem significant until I tried laying out a paper exhaust using the larger bends. The tube intersections became even more difficult; and the overall look was, well, ugly. So, I spent several days making and testing a 2" die for my bender. One of the photos shows it next to the bender's original cast iron die.
I tested the die using some stainless drops in my scrap collection. I had a few pieces of 5/8" tubing in three different wall thicknesses: .035", .049", and .065". The new die created near perfect bends in the .065" and .049" tubing, but the bend cross-sections in the .035" tubes were noticeably oval-shaped. They were improved when filled with Cerrobend, though.
I continued using the original roller that came with the bender since, after a bit of re-work, it fit the tubing perfectly. I accidentally discovered it was important to not snug the roller up against the tubing before sweeping it around the die to make the bend. Without a quarter inch or so gap, it invariably marked the tubing. Using the bender in this way seemed counterintuitive, but its instruction manual was clear about closing the roller against the tubing.
I ultimately settled on .049" for the tubing wall thickness since there's little space on the exhaust flange for a .065" wall thickness after the tube is swaged. And, since I'll probably have to make a lot of bends before I get four tubes properly fitted, I didn't want to deal with the Cerrobend. The swaging tool I'd already machined was designed for .035" tubing, and so a new one had to be made to avoid scrapping the already finished exhaust flange with its tube recesses.
The ends of the tubes must be swaged after they're bent, and this creates a work-holding problem. Since the swaging operation requires everything my half-ton arbor press can deliver, a stout fixture that won't mar the tubing is required. My solution, shown in the photos, was a clamshell machined from a couple pieces of red oak.
For practice, I soldered some of my swaged test pieces to a dummy flange to compare the three varieties of silver solder that I have on hand: Silvalloy 355 (from Brownells), Prince & Izant 50 ni3, and some cadmium bearing Silvalloy 35 (purchased from McMaster- Carr). The cadmium bearing solder flowed noticeably easier and would create the need for less metal finishing, but the Silvalloy 355 gave the best color match to stainless. Since I'm currently planning to polish the finished exhaust, I'll likely use the Silvalloy 355. If I knew I was going to paint the finished exhaust, I'd for sure use the Silvalloy 35. The solder manufacturers recommend the black (rather than white) flux for metals with tough oxide coatings such as stainless steel. I tried both, and the joints were definitely wetted better by the black flux.
I used up on testing what little .049" wall thickness tubing I had on hand and am currently waiting on some to arrive. Unfortunately, it seems to be lost in transit, and the supplier wants to wait a few more days before shipping a replacement. - Terry
I tested the die using some stainless drops in my scrap collection. I had a few pieces of 5/8" tubing in three different wall thicknesses: .035", .049", and .065". The new die created near perfect bends in the .065" and .049" tubing, but the bend cross-sections in the .035" tubes were noticeably oval-shaped. They were improved when filled with Cerrobend, though.
I continued using the original roller that came with the bender since, after a bit of re-work, it fit the tubing perfectly. I accidentally discovered it was important to not snug the roller up against the tubing before sweeping it around the die to make the bend. Without a quarter inch or so gap, it invariably marked the tubing. Using the bender in this way seemed counterintuitive, but its instruction manual was clear about closing the roller against the tubing.
I ultimately settled on .049" for the tubing wall thickness since there's little space on the exhaust flange for a .065" wall thickness after the tube is swaged. And, since I'll probably have to make a lot of bends before I get four tubes properly fitted, I didn't want to deal with the Cerrobend. The swaging tool I'd already machined was designed for .035" tubing, and so a new one had to be made to avoid scrapping the already finished exhaust flange with its tube recesses.
The ends of the tubes must be swaged after they're bent, and this creates a work-holding problem. Since the swaging operation requires everything my half-ton arbor press can deliver, a stout fixture that won't mar the tubing is required. My solution, shown in the photos, was a clamshell machined from a couple pieces of red oak.
For practice, I soldered some of my swaged test pieces to a dummy flange to compare the three varieties of silver solder that I have on hand: Silvalloy 355 (from Brownells), Prince & Izant 50 ni3, and some cadmium bearing Silvalloy 35 (purchased from McMaster- Carr). The cadmium bearing solder flowed noticeably easier and would create the need for less metal finishing, but the Silvalloy 355 gave the best color match to stainless. Since I'm currently planning to polish the finished exhaust, I'll likely use the Silvalloy 355. If I knew I was going to paint the finished exhaust, I'd for sure use the Silvalloy 35. The solder manufacturers recommend the black (rather than white) flux for metals with tough oxide coatings such as stainless steel. I tried both, and the joints were definitely wetted better by the black flux.
I used up on testing what little .049" wall thickness tubing I had on hand and am currently waiting on some to arrive. Unfortunately, it seems to be lost in transit, and the supplier wants to wait a few more days before shipping a replacement. - Terry