So, I commenced measuring all the contributing dimensions (there are many). Rod throw, piston height, cylinder deck height, cam lobe rise, valve clearance… Everything was within a thou of drawings. I did deviate slightly from drawings by decreasing the valve seat width, but net effect actually increased the valve cage submergence up into the head chamber & served to provide even more valve clearance.
I did a little bit of CAD motion study & concluded there was indeed theoretical clearance but it was actually quite close which I never bothered to consider before. If I was seeing the effects of valve float or temperature increase, this might add up to several thou & that seemed to be the extent of valve strike impression.
I’m really not sure but in any event, it needed to be dealt with, so I considered my options. I could add a head shim & gain some valve clearance that way, but at the expense of compression ratio. I estimated I was nominally at or under 9:1 but CR drops to 8.6:1 with only 0.005” shim or 8.3:1 with 0.010” etc. Maybe I had sufficient CR to spare but it seemed counterproductive to chase that option if the interference represented the same 0.010” confined to a tiny, localized impression area.
I could add a shim under the cylinder flange which raises the head from the fixed piston throw. That has the same CR reduction effect, but I was already contemplating some kind of gasket under the cylinder flanges to help with metal-on-metal mating & bolts loosening.
The other option was to cut extended crescent shaped recess pockets into the piston tops aligned to the valve strike area. I couldn’t go too crazy on this depth wise, limited by the piston crown thickness, but on paper it bought me significantly more potential clearance with minimal CR change. I could always still do the shimming if required.
I still had my piston holding fixture used for milling the rod clearance pockets. The fixture has a through hole for the wristpin, so that would self-align the piston orientation. Then it was a relatively simple matter of angling the piston/fixture in the mill vise to the valve angle & dropping down an endmill to increase the pocket dimensions. I did the other (intake) side the same just as a precaution & smoothened the edges with rubber abrasive. You can see the before & after net result.