Instead of endlessly arguing/discussing which engine is more efficient, perhaps we could get back to the main subject of post #173, that being the method of generating electricity from a TT at full RPM.
I read the Wiki Page and found it to be very misleading. All heat engines are compared against the carnot cycle. As the primary tenant in thermodynamics is work and heat are equivalent , enthalpy is derived from these concepts. Boundary conditions are important. You can calculate an engine efficiency or a cycle efficiency. The wiki page uses these interchangeably in their analysis. I have yet to see any telsa calculations that demonstrate an efficiency of anywhere near 60%.As has been pointed out, there are no practical TTs available for efficiency tests. They're mostly (perhaps all) one-offs and hobbyists creations.
Comparing power station, or ocean-going ship sized steam turbines to all the desk-top TTs is a bit of apples to oranges comparison. Study a desk-top sized power station turbine and I'm quite certain you'll find the efficiency drops considerably. For several fluid flow reasons, axial steam turbines don't scale down very well.
Several studies indicate TT rotor efficiencies can exceed 90% Wiki Tesla Page. Seems reasonable to believe that TTs have substantial growth potential. Because of their low manufacturing cost, I can see where TTs might be a good choice for residential power production.
I posted this in May of 2023: "About 23 years ago when I was running my business, we built what I believe to be a true Tesla Turbine.can anyone point out any uses of Tesla Turbine in the real world, a real product, not just a toy or a demonstration model ?
OK, but what did it do?I posted this in May of 2023: "About 23 years ago when I was running my business, we built what I believe to be a true Tesla Turbine.
The Discs were 20" diameter and I believe there were 19 of them. They were no vanes or blades on them and just relied on the boundary layer of the Discs to rotate them. We made the first of 60 units and they were powered by a huge parabolic dish that turned water into steam from the sun. It even had a condenser to reclaim the water from the steam".
Powered an electrical generator.OK, but what did it do?
Jet engines were the same due to flat compressor blades which caused minimal compression until someone figured out that they needed the blades to be tapered...OK, so my point is this, the Tesla Turbine isn't used anywhere for anything for a very good reason, its inefficient, and there's no getting around that fact (hence not even the military would use it), so it never ceases to amaze me that people keep on building demonstration models of something that isn't practical, its a jee-wiz parlor trick engine with no applications, and a really lousy way of getting into actual turbines. its not like building a flame-licker engine that has no applications, in that case you've at least accomplished building most of the parts needed for an IC engine, but with the Tesla Turbine you haven't made a single blade, and that's what turbines are all about, gas or fluid flow around blades; aerodynamics, fluid dynamics, and thermodynamics, which are all extremely interesting and fascinating topics, but the Tesla Turbine doesn't get you there. my "rant cast" for the day, sorry, over-and-out...
As has been pointed out, there are no practical TTs available for efficiency tests. They're mostly (perhaps all) one-offs and hobbyists creations.
Comparing power station, or ocean-going ship sized steam turbines to all the desk-top TTs is a bit of apples to oranges comparison. Study a desk-top sized power station turbine and I'm quite certain you'll find the efficiency drops considerably. For several fluid flow reasons, axial steam turbines don't scale down very well.
Several studies indicate TT rotor efficiencies can exceed 90% Wiki Tesla Page. Seems reasonable to believe that TTs have substantial growth potential. Because of their low manufacturing cost, I can see where TTs might be a good choice for residential power production.
Are you familiar with FES?
Sorry, Flywheel Energy Storage.I know FEA = Finite Element Analysis,...but I'm a blank on FES.
I posted this in May of 2023: "About 23 years ago when I was running my business, we built what I believe to be a true Tesla Turbine.
The Discs were 20" diameter and I believe there were 19 of them. They were no vanes or blades on them and just relied on the boundary layer of the Discs to rotate them. We made the first of 60 units and they were powered by a huge parabolic dish that turned water into steam from the sun. It even had a condenser to reclaim the water from the steam".
I built the Prototype to my customers design and specifications. Somebody else built the parabolic dish to generate the heat and turn the water into steam. My customer did the testing. I have no idea how the testing went or if any of the other 60 units were built. I think their goal was power generation in third world countries.so you prototyped this, and abandoned it after you measured the efficiency and decided that even solar panels which are pretty inefficient would generate more electricity ???
Instead of endlessly arguing/discussing which engine is more efficient, perhaps we could get back to the main subject of post #173, that being the method of generating electricity from a TT at full RPM.
More like pointy sticks then cigars, lately, but your point is well taken.Just an observation:
It is almost like there are 2 threads going on here. First, @Toymaker 's original hands-on efforts to build a TT in his shop. And then a second, more esoteric thread, in the parlor, with gentleman's smoking jackets and tobacco pipes and brandy, discussing the theory, practicality, and philosophy of the TT and similar devices, which add minimal assistance to the original intent of Toymaker, who is out in the shop getting his hands dirty.
Both are good discussions, but separate discussions. Just my tongue in cheek outside observation.
@Toymaker is an electronics (retired) wizard. I think it's form over function that he is after, because he seems highly capable of taking care of the function.Aren't the electronics needed to tame the variable frequency and voltage output from a high speed alternator like toymaker sketched in post #173 already somewhat available. They may not yet cover the broad range that @Toymaker is ultimately looking for, but who knows what is being developed.
Just Googling for AC to AC variable frequency and variable voltage Input And Output Convertors yields some interesting results.
BTW, I have not seen any rare earth magnets polarized as you drew in #173, but I have used several round magnets together with 2 strips of steel to fashion a bar with that type of polarity. The magnets "resisted" being grouped as needed for that application.
Enter your email address to join: