vederstein
Must do dumb things....
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2011
- Messages
- 927
- Reaction score
- 760
On to my next engine.
I was looking at Elmer's #46. The Coomber engine. (I don't know if it's "Coomber" or "Comber". I've seen it spelled both ways.)
Anyway, these designs always have the cam ring with the cam rollers on the inside. I was thinking what would happen if I put the cam rollers on the outside:
1. The cam would be easier to make with manual equipment. It would like machining a large cam profile for a gas engine.
2. The cam would be overall smaller because the rollers are on the outside and not the inside, making for a smaller part.
So I proceeded to do some conceptual design work to just flesh out the idea a bit.
At this stage I like that the elliptical shape of the cam is more accentuated from a circle and its shape can be more identified as not circular.
Here's a short video of the idea.
(As usual, if this engine goes to completion, I'll post the design files on this forum.)
What do you all think?
I was looking at Elmer's #46. The Coomber engine. (I don't know if it's "Coomber" or "Comber". I've seen it spelled both ways.)
Anyway, these designs always have the cam ring with the cam rollers on the inside. I was thinking what would happen if I put the cam rollers on the outside:
1. The cam would be easier to make with manual equipment. It would like machining a large cam profile for a gas engine.
2. The cam would be overall smaller because the rollers are on the outside and not the inside, making for a smaller part.
So I proceeded to do some conceptual design work to just flesh out the idea a bit.
At this stage I like that the elliptical shape of the cam is more accentuated from a circle and its shape can be more identified as not circular.
Here's a short video of the idea.
(As usual, if this engine goes to completion, I'll post the design files on this forum.)
What do you all think?