Pete,
You will find that when you come to make some engines, you will spend more time making tooling and holding fixtures than actually making the parts, that is a fact of life in our hobby.
Just wait until you come to make the camshaft the Westbury way.
This is a Whippet I built a few years ago and is still in my collection.
These pictures show it after it has run for a fair while. You will notice that the side valve mechanism isn't too oil tight, I think you will find the same on the Wallaby. The Seal actually uses a cover to keep it away from prying eyes. It was this engine
that put me off working with castings for a long time. The ones made by Woking precision were abysmal, and it looks like the Hemingway ones are no better.
The only other one that I have pictures of are for the Cygnet Royale
As featured on the FAME Site, in their external combustion archive. Another picture of it is also used on the Hemingway site, the green one at the top
http://www.hemingwaykits.com/acatalog/The_Cygnet_Royal___Edgar_T_Westbury.html
Now residing in a new home.
Going back a long way now, I built the Seagull. From what I do remember, It had cylinders and heads like the Whippet, as they were separated units, and the pistons as far as I can recall, went up and down together, one on compression stroke while the other was on exhaust.
That was donated to a good home as well, as do most of my engines, eventually.
I did have a set of Seal castings to make, but after reading about all the drawing problems and half hearted cures needed, I sold them on. That would take a lot of research to get one built and working correctly.
John