I think the difference isn't so much that the fundamental technology used for fastening has changed, but rather that the fundamental technology used for producing fasteners/fastenings has changed.
When all you had was a hammer and anvil, it was easier to beat things generally flat and rectangular, punch rectangular holes, pound out a triangular wedge, and use a through-mortise with a wedged tenon to hold pieces together, than to try to forge cylinders, make round holes and cut or swage threads.
With the advent to spinny things, it became easier to drill/ream tapered holes rather than to punch holes, to turn taper pins rather than hammer out wedges, and to put the wedge (spiral-wise) onto the part itself, rather than punching holes and using a separate wedge.
Fundamentally, the wedged tenon shown by Tony in post #6 is identical to such a joint where the end of the tenon was threaded and a nut applied to secure the joint - the difference is only in that the wedged tenon shown was the easiest way to implement an inclined plane using poundy tools, and the thread/nut would be the easiest way using spinny tools.
One might wonder more, perhaps, about rectangular-wedge-type joinery that is not equivalent to round/spiral wedge-type joinery. The wedged blind mortise/tenon would not appear to have a direct analog in the round/spinny world. This may be because, in that joint, the wedge is deforming one of the members, rather than simply applying pressure.