Charles,
Two different problems
1) Non-Standard pitch circle - in the case of the 7T 64 DP gear it had to go over a 2mm shaft so an oversize pitch circle was used.
The modified PC approach is used when circumstances dictate you cannot use the correct theoretical value (shaft size, axle pitching etc.).
2) Interference when using small tooth count pinnions - Can be solved by addendum modification or as you pointed out by my slightly different regeneration method - there are probably a number of tooth profile modification methods.
Either way, the moment you deviate from theoretical you introduce an element of "sliding" - relative motion of one tooth face to the other at point of contact - as opposed to the correct "rolling" motion of one tooth against the other with no relative motion at the point of contact.
Which of course leads to greater friction losses and wear problems.
I was not advocating pitch circle enlargement as a means of getting away from interference.
If you have a pair of ruined gears - all you need is the number of teeth and the axle pitches and everything else follows - some people are amazed by this resurection of manufacturing data from apparently little to go on - however when a non-standard approach has been used, all bets are off - hence my dislike of non-standard gearing.
Ken
Two different problems
1) Non-Standard pitch circle - in the case of the 7T 64 DP gear it had to go over a 2mm shaft so an oversize pitch circle was used.
The modified PC approach is used when circumstances dictate you cannot use the correct theoretical value (shaft size, axle pitching etc.).
2) Interference when using small tooth count pinnions - Can be solved by addendum modification or as you pointed out by my slightly different regeneration method - there are probably a number of tooth profile modification methods.
Either way, the moment you deviate from theoretical you introduce an element of "sliding" - relative motion of one tooth face to the other at point of contact - as opposed to the correct "rolling" motion of one tooth against the other with no relative motion at the point of contact.
Which of course leads to greater friction losses and wear problems.
I was not advocating pitch circle enlargement as a means of getting away from interference.
If you have a pair of ruined gears - all you need is the number of teeth and the axle pitches and everything else follows - some people are amazed by this resurection of manufacturing data from apparently little to go on - however when a non-standard approach has been used, all bets are off - hence my dislike of non-standard gearing.
Ken