Green,
does not appear to be a wobbler, does not appear to be a scotch yoke, does not appear to be able to turn over, what am I missing ?
Peter.
I am having trouble finding the original "Direct Connect" steam engine article, but it was in a Lindsay reprinted book about old steam engines.
This was one of the Lindsay challenges that Lindsay sent my dad.
My dad saw the article, and said "no problem", and build a working engine, which runs superbly.
Dad had a gift for understanding odd and obscure old engine mechanisms.
Dad could look at an engraving and a few sections, and then completely understand the kinematics very quickly.
He would then create geometic sketches that laid out the critical geometry, and then dad would build the engine.
All of dad's engines ran very well. There was never a problem with any of them running smoothly.
Here is dad's geometric sketches for the Direct Connect.
I will keep looking for the original article.
The closest thing I can find is a double scotch yoke (picture attached), which was a layout used to make toys.
The toy would have two shuttles (crossheads) that ran in the yoke slots.
The shuttles would be connected by an arm, and when you cranked on the arm via a pin on the end of the arm, the shuttles would go back and forth in the slots.
The Direct Connect engine has two crankshafts; one is a standard shaft with disk on the end, and a crank pin in the disk.
The second crankshaft is free-floating, with one end working in the first crankshaft pin.
It is an arrangement that does not seem to be practical or feasible at all, and yet the engine runs extremely well (I will look for a video).
The piston rod movement is linear, and no crossheads are required, which allows a very compact twin cylinder design.
.