Looks good. Some things to ponder as you advance through your prototype.
- consider how you will reliably make a flat bottom hole and of the correct ID simultaneously. You can't effectively ream the hole because the reamer has a chamfer. An end mill doesn't typically have a sharp corner and a perfectly flat bottom but that's what I found to be best compromise, unless you have one of those nice traversing boring heads. Its better to err on a couple thou deeper to land the cage slightly off bottom if necessary according to how the valve positions. A gap isn't great but maybe would be Loctite filled anyways, not much different than bonding the annular wall.
- you will need some reliable datum to pre-register the cutting tool because it will be entering your cone chamber at a funky angle. In my case it was better to use the jig datum, but your mileage may vary.
- I found it better to select the cutting tool (10mm EM in my case) & then work out the valve cage OD from that for the appropriate fit. I chamfered the crown of the valve cage so it has clearance relative to counterbore corner.
- In my case it was better to drill the pilot hole first (corresponding to the valves stem). This removes material at the center where the EM doesn't like to plunge very well. You can decide if you want that segment to be glued as well as the cage for extra retention or make it a clearance hole. I had difficulty with the former. Only issue is its a longer pilot hole with smaller diameter so higher propensity to drift.
- Terry cut radial grooves in his valve cage OD's to take up excess Loctite. I haven tried that yet. But I did get a surprise on one tester that set up a lot quicker than I expected. They were squeaky clean & just a bit closer gap on that particular set. No primer or kicker or anything. Not sure what was going on there but do some tests before your real head.
What is the valve seat contact length you are designing for? That's another thing I am messing with. I want it to be about 0.010" via the valve seat cutter & leave me 0.005" truing/lapping allowance. Seems like when folks make it wider, say 20-30 thou, more difficulty sealing. Another consideration is where that valve seat facet on the cage contacts the 45-deg valve face. If the contact point is out near the valve OD that keeps the valve higher up into the cage & a more flush appearance in the combustion chamber when valve closed. If the contact point is more inboard towards the valve stem, the opposite occurs - valve kind of sticks proud. I finally realized this on another radial design where the valves stuck out (easier to make the cages) but had requisite scallops in the piston top to compensate. So yes, best to make the valve now so you can check the interaction of the combined assembly.