- Joined
- Dec 2, 2008
- Messages
- 971
- Reaction score
- 9
How accurate are these things supposed to be. I recently got one of the old standby units with one pointy end and one small cylindrical end, the kind that kicks offset when it contacts the edge. I had been using a piece of .25 drill rod and a piece of paper to find an edge but thought these would be better. To eliminate or at least reduce operator error, I usually touch of on the edge until I get three consistent values. I thought I was getting good results but I found out today that I was off.
I wanted to find the center of a 2" face to mark for the lathe center. I located one edge and zeroed the DRO (caliper) and the raised the quill and traversed to the opposite side, lowered the quill and approached the edge. The width is known to be .002"
under (1.998") and I was surprised to find see the edge finder kick out at 2.212". Subtracting .200" for the diameter of the contact cylinder leaves 2.012" or .014" off. Finding the center was OK. I just backed up until the DRO read 1.106". I zeroed at this point and confirmed the two edges at 1.106" and -1.106" OK, that's center but what about the dimension, can I trust the edge finder to do its job? I measured the contact cylinder to be .203" instead of .200" but that's not enough to account for the difference.
Should I expect more?
Jerry
I wanted to find the center of a 2" face to mark for the lathe center. I located one edge and zeroed the DRO (caliper) and the raised the quill and traversed to the opposite side, lowered the quill and approached the edge. The width is known to be .002"
under (1.998") and I was surprised to find see the edge finder kick out at 2.212". Subtracting .200" for the diameter of the contact cylinder leaves 2.012" or .014" off. Finding the center was OK. I just backed up until the DRO read 1.106". I zeroed at this point and confirmed the two edges at 1.106" and -1.106" OK, that's center but what about the dimension, can I trust the edge finder to do its job? I measured the contact cylinder to be .203" instead of .200" but that's not enough to account for the difference.
Should I expect more?
Jerry