I also have a virtual machine running XP . I use https://www.oracle.com/virtualization/virtualbox/Mike, a couple of thoughts (which you may already have thought and discarded, but just in case):
1) Use a virtual machine to keep running XP or any other version of Windows - assuming you have a copy of that version of Windows that you can use. Running it in a VM without network connections will keep it safe despite not being updated, but still be conveniently available on your primary machine. I run VirtualBox and have both Windows XP and Windows 10 virtual machines available, though the last thing I needed XP for is on its way out. I also have a Windows 7 image; haven't used it in a long time, but it is still there if I ever do need it.
2) See if an open-source alternative would fit your needs. I have heard it said that using LibreCAD is somewhat similar to using ACAD - I don't know if that is true, since I've only used ACAD for about 5 minutes one time. I would think that a current version of LibreCAD would probably have at least all of the features that a 10 or 20 year old version of ACAD had - ? Again, don't know if that is true.
And one more thought that has already begun to be discussed above:
3) Use the opportunity to make the transition from 2D to 3D CAD. Make no mistake; it IS a transition; you have to learn a new way of thinking about the design process. For me a way to describe it is that I had to learn to model something rather than to make drawings of something. One can then turn the model into 2D drawings as needed, but that needs to be a later step, not the first step as in 2D.
The discussion above has explored some of the pros and cons of different commercial packages. If you dig around on the forum, you will find other extended discussions that include the pros and cons of open-source alternatives. I personally use the latter (FreeCAD), and it does everything I need as a hobbyist.
Pros: free and open source, so not going to get taken behind a paywall; ability to read and write in a huge variety of formats (STEP, IGES, etc.); has CAM features built in (which I have not yet had occasion to use, so can't speak to how adequate they may or may not be); tons of on-line tutorials; undegoing rapid development, so always getting better.
Cons: undergoing rapid development, so many of the on-line tutorials may be slightly or greatly out of date; for the same reason, the user interface is not always consistent from one workbench (module) to another; will not have all of the features and capabilities of the top commercial products. Some people say it is hard to learn, but in many cases, my sense is that the primary issue is not FreeCAD specifically, but rather transitioning to 3D CAD.
Obviously, different people's mileage will vary, but for me and what I need at this point, the pros far outweigh the cons. Yes, definitely a learning curve, but for me it was definitely at least as much or more about learning to think 3D as it was about learning FreeCAD. There are times when I see a tutorial on Fusion360 that I think, "Oh, I wish FreeCAD did it that way - that's easier" ... but there also times when I think, "Oh, that's an awkward way to do that; FreeCAD is so much easier."
Works great too.
I set to use the filing system on windows 11 and copy/past from windows 11 to windows xp.
Dave