J
JorgensenSteam
Guest
Use this button

giovanni said:I'm going to have 100psi.
Do you think these tubes would have a thick enough wall thickness?
steamin said:Thank you gentlemen, if it were a snake it would have bitten my right pinky off. Try as hard as I can to proof read before I post, there seems to be a mistake in content or just plan wording.
steamin said:I totally agree with you on boiler calcs. I had to furnish them to the state of North Carolina Board of Labor for the build of my 1/3 scale CASE 65. I found some great stuff at the state of Maryland Boiler Division for calculating everything but the flue tubes themselves. I have gone through my two booklets on building "model" copper boilers, but found no mention on how to properly size flue tubes or how to calculate the other boiler parameters. I have several drawings for model copper boilers that specify a certain size of flue tube but I have no idea how they came to that size.
All known attempts to create a US Model Code in the last 50 years, and there have been a number, have been squashed by two attitudes. Those would be the "Ain't nobody going to tell me what I can or can't do with my train" folks, who always quote something about "freedom" or "rights" or some such, and then there are the "A Model Code is great, as long as the person dictating what's in it is ME." folks. Then some of the objections are about dollars, people don't want to have to do things right because doing it right might cost them more money or be more trouble. I understand that, but one boiler done on the cheap or carelessly, resulting in one injury, is all it would take to bring unwanted Gubmint scrutiny down on our heads. I've been shouted down in more than one forum for speaking in favor of a US national model code - it's a very touchy subject. One thing some model code objectors don't seem to be willing to accept is gaining legal standing under a state code by an exclusion. This can protect live steamers far more than we are hurt by it. There are number of states where operating an amateur built miniature boiler was once illlegal, a felony, and might still be if it hadn't been for the foresight and work of live steamers in gaining an exclusions in their state boiler codes. But there is a tradeoff for legal standing which is that we must abide by the terms of the exclusions, which can vary widely from state to state, but in retrospect exclusions seem to me to be a more workable solution than herding cats (ie, creating a national model code.)steamin said:A few of us modelers were trying to start the procedure for establishing model codes in NC, but it met a lot of opposition from the vast majority of model steam participants. They had no kind words for inspectors and an inspection process, so the movement has died.