MrMetric
Well-Known Member
cadsculptor... I don't think you'll have any complaints about Fusion's capabilities within this forum. However, I'm not sure I agree, respectfully, that it remains the best game in town after today though. I've started to check into OnShape and it seems like it could be a nice fit for what many of us want. No, it isn't the panacea but, frankly, neither is Fusion. And I can do stuff with OnShape that I'll no longer be able to do with Fusion.... Let me say that again.... OnShape will have more (CNC) capabilities than Fusion. That is a statement that I'm sure AutoDesk would rather not have widely discussed, but it is the reality of the free customer after tonight!
I must say that I'm wondering a bit how AutoDesk is going to handle the ATC thing. If they don't allow you to setup different tools, then that would be a major crippling of the application, I think (to the point where I might even argue, after trying it out to confirm, that the product isn't even functional). But if you simply have a place where you can easily (manually) insert a tool change macro into the G-code, then that seems like it just an inconvenience. Maybe that is the extent of what AutoDesk is attempting to accomplish; a business wants to have seamless flow, but hobbyists will always find a way around a problem.... I'll see how it all works over the weekend, I suppose, because I am *not* leasing Fusion... Rapids could be manually inserted too, I guess, although that would be ugly and probably a whole lot more dangerous.
I'm still looking at CamBam as my go to solution as I move away from Fusion. And, maybe this will encourage developers to make FreeCAD a better product. If we can get a decent 3D modeling application that is truly, and forever, free, then that would be good. I don't need all of the bells and whistles of Fusion for a hobby, and I can certainly put that perpetual $400 fee for Fusion each year to good use. And I really want to play with 5 axis someday. That would be an interesting tinker thing. If AutoDesk thinks this makes me a professional then they should go check out all of the forums and past KickStarter campaigns. They've been littered with people making cheap 3, 4, 5, and 6 axis machines.
I must say that I'm wondering a bit how AutoDesk is going to handle the ATC thing. If they don't allow you to setup different tools, then that would be a major crippling of the application, I think (to the point where I might even argue, after trying it out to confirm, that the product isn't even functional). But if you simply have a place where you can easily (manually) insert a tool change macro into the G-code, then that seems like it just an inconvenience. Maybe that is the extent of what AutoDesk is attempting to accomplish; a business wants to have seamless flow, but hobbyists will always find a way around a problem.... I'll see how it all works over the weekend, I suppose, because I am *not* leasing Fusion... Rapids could be manually inserted too, I guess, although that would be ugly and probably a whole lot more dangerous.
I'm still looking at CamBam as my go to solution as I move away from Fusion. And, maybe this will encourage developers to make FreeCAD a better product. If we can get a decent 3D modeling application that is truly, and forever, free, then that would be good. I don't need all of the bells and whistles of Fusion for a hobby, and I can certainly put that perpetual $400 fee for Fusion each year to good use. And I really want to play with 5 axis someday. That would be an interesting tinker thing. If AutoDesk thinks this makes me a professional then they should go check out all of the forums and past KickStarter campaigns. They've been littered with people making cheap 3, 4, 5, and 6 axis machines.