Bob - slightly off topic - but you did say that statistics was your middle name.
I once visited Fichtel & Sachs and queried a Vickers microhardness check which they had placed on a report as 1052.1 - I said that such accuracy wasn't possible.
Turns out I was wrong - they calibrated each and every one of their inspectors against known standard samples - so they had a statistical offset and error range for each inspector.
By having 5 persons taking a reading they could then statistically masturbate the data into a more precise answer.
Trust the Germans to be so precise as to "calibrate" their people.
Hence my comment - and K2's valuable suggestion to calibrate yourself against a known standard.
Regards, Ken
Edit-P.S. as a reference use a ball-bearing of the same I.D. they're generally pretty accurate.
I once visited Fichtel & Sachs and queried a Vickers microhardness check which they had placed on a report as 1052.1 - I said that such accuracy wasn't possible.
Turns out I was wrong - they calibrated each and every one of their inspectors against known standard samples - so they had a statistical offset and error range for each inspector.
By having 5 persons taking a reading they could then statistically masturbate the data into a more precise answer.
Trust the Germans to be so precise as to "calibrate" their people.
Hence my comment - and K2's valuable suggestion to calibrate yourself against a known standard.
Regards, Ken
Edit-P.S. as a reference use a ball-bearing of the same I.D. they're generally pretty accurate.