The Big Slide Thread

Home Model Engine Machinist Forum

Help Support Home Model Engine Machinist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I used a slide rule frequently in one of my first jobs. It was a sales office where we purchase the parts and subcontracted fabrication of special equipment that we, the engineering department designed. At the end of the job we had to recap the job to determine how much the engineering department had earned or lost on each job. That involved calculating a 15% markup on all purchased parts and labor. That was done by dividing the cost by 85 which was done with a slide rule. The accounting department was always trying to transfer engineering department funds to other department. This was in the days before everyone had a calculator. The only calculator was a mechanical Monroe on the accounts desk thus the slide rule calculations. We usually came out within 1% of the accounting department because the estimates on the precision of the slide rule were as often high as they were low so in the end it came pretty close.

On a side note: There was always an uneasy relationship between the accountant and the engineering department. Periodically when he went to the restroom someone would go up to his desk and divide some number by zero and the that would cause an endless loop and the mechanical calculator would just keep clunking away until someone stopped it or the bearings gave out.
 
I had to look that one up.
Found a picture below.

And they forced us to use a Smith Chart in the field theory class.
I must confess, I never got the feel for using a Smith chart.
I understood that it was a tool used to solve fields problems, but it also has sort of a corn maize feel to it too.
I have seen others use a Smith chart, such as my profesor, and so I know it works.
The first thing that came to mind when I saw a Smith chart was "what the flock are they trying to make use do now?".
Sort of like Chinese water torture; the things they use to force us to use.

.
It had been many years since plotting my last Smith Chart. Recently I bought one of the two port 3 GHz VNA gizmos that are now less than $200 USD for playing with some antenna and feedline designs, an old interest that I have time to fool around with now. It's quite interesting how useful a Smith chart is when a gadget plots it for you, all the impedance vectors plotted in seconds with that lovely 50 ohm point dead center.

Hopefully re-learning some of this stuff and keeping on learning new things will help keep the aging brain from turning to mush.

As asked in the fine film Airplane, "What's the vector Victor? :cool:
 
Ironically, this is sort of what I consider the "slide rule" of lathes; ie: it is old, manually operated, clunky compared with modern CNC machines, but a very capable machine in the hands of someone who knows how to use it.
The new guys would say "Where is the keyboard ?".
.
The first shop I worked in had a number of lathes like that with added on electric motors and a four speed transmission, one of them had a 6 foot swing spindle and a 2 foot swing on the same lathe. The story was that the shop had a foundry at one point and when the city streetcar barns burned, they were given that lathe that was used to recondition the wheels as scrap, they got a job that requires a large swing so the bronze bearings were replaced and it was put back into use. It wasn't used often but it was the only lathe that size anywhere close.
 
It had been many years since plotting my last Smith Chart. Recently I bought one of the two port 3 GHz VNA gizmos that are now less than $200 USD for playing with some antenna and feedline designs, an old interest that I have time to fool around with now. It's quite interesting how useful a Smith chart is when a gadget plots it for you, all the impedance vectors plotted in seconds with that lovely 50 ohm point dead center.

Hopefully re-learning some of this stuff and keeping on learning new things will help keep the aging brain from turning to mush.

As asked in the fine film Airplane, "What's the vector Victor? :cool:
I purchased a NanoVNA for my antenna experiments, and can’t believe how powerful something that small can be, and all for $50 American!

John W
 
I was fascinated by slide-rules and learned how to use one, and then used it exclusively for a Physics I, and Chemistry course in college. (I'm a 90s kid) It turns out, that the types of problems you have to solve there lend themselves very well to the slide rule.

To use one, you have to understand that log(A*B) = log(A) + log(B), and also understand that the calculations across powers of ten result in the same digits. i.e. 25 * 4 = 100, but also 0.25 * 0.4 = 0.100 Same digits, but the decimal place moves. Tracking the decimal place (in your head) as you continue calculations is the toughest part, but it isn't really that difficult.

Since the "rule" of the slide rule is laid out logarithimically, (i.e. the lines get closer together the closer you get to the right), when you add together the distance from the edge of the outer to the edge of the inner, you are actually adding together log(A) and Log(B). So multiplication is done just by "adding" the two distances together, i.e. looking to see what number across from B on the A scale.

Physics & Chemistry are a bunch of calculations that are a string of multiplication and division. And because A*B/(C*D) = A/B * C/D freely, you can just accumulate the end result by adding and subtracting on the slide rule, while keeping a running total of what decimal places you are adding on/off.

The slide rule is one of the reasons that "scientific notation" is a thing. As you write a number in scientific notation, you are effectively preparing it *directly* for being applied to the slide rule. You see immediately the whole+partial number that is the distance you are going to slide on the rule, and you see directly the powers of ten that you are tracking during the calculation.

Further, because of the limitations of precision (you can only slide the rule so precisely. Maybe you can enter 1.27, but not 1.275); the slide rule naturally maintains significant digits for you. You don't have to wonder if you have bonkers unrealistic precision in your result. (A simple example: 1 / 3 = 0.3333333333333 on a calculator, but there is no way you could guarantee OR measure that accurately). The slide rule will never give you a result like that beyond your significant digits.

It is actually a beautiful instrument, but I admit it has its niche in real-world applications like physics and chemistry, and not more abstract subjects like maths.
I understand that one of the reasons calculators added significant digits is that in constructing the Interstates, after calculators became available, is that the first calculators had 8 digits, but then the interstates at curves and bridges started to be off a foot or two after miles of laying concrete. It turned out sine and cosine needed more accuracy so they developed 10 place calculators. In physics, one might need 10 places (or even more), particularly in astronomy. I can use slide rules and if I see one at a garage sale, I certainly will grab it up.
 
This first slide rule I used on first model aircraft engines I designed back 1960's . This slide ruler was designed for drafting tables. On the backside has cork at each end and center has units like miles to k meters and N miles .
Meter conversion to English.

Work great till electronic calculators cameout.

It handy for some I could do log for formula like navigation calculations like great circle navigation.

View attachment 162029
*
View attachment 162030

Dave
I'll buy it. HOw much?
 
I do find it interesting that folks are upset about the "Break Room" category going off topic. I have never even noticed that there was such a category. I always just load unread topics which includes all topics and then I read the ones that I am interested in and mark all topics read so everything shown is new. If I am interested in a particular topic I may follow that topic which gives me an email alert.
 
I do find it interesting that folks are upset about the "Break Room" category going off topic. I have never even noticed that there was such a category. I always just load unread topics which includes all topics and then I read the ones that I am interested in and mark all topics read so everything shown is new. If I am interested in a particular topic I may follow that topic which gives me an email alert.
Precisely. I don't get it either.
 
did you ever master the slide rule or did anyone ever master it, I go one last week at an estate sale with a bunch of machinist tools and the Kennedy toolbox, I would like to find instruction on the slide rule to see what it is all about, Joe
There are several older text books that describe how to use a slide rule. It is based on logarithms and so when you move the slides you simply are adding the logs of numbers and are multiplying and dividing. A good rule will have several scales to use. The challenging part of using one is maintaining in your head where the decimal point is in the number and the specific digits that are meaningful in the answer.

I once asked a professor what the difference in teaching with modern calculators vs a slide rule was and he replied I can now ask questions without the thought of how difficult the math might be. Sort of a good news bad news if you are a student. A question requiring a calculator is likely to be more complex and involved.

Another fun fact is the materials used to make them were designed not to expand with and contract with temperature. Thats to maintain accuracy in the scales. They can be quite expensive and good ones are now hard to find.
 
I think I still have my first slide rule somewhere in a desk drawer. I got it in high school but by the time I actually got a job in engineering, calculators were becoming common. Remember RPN? I don't have a HP calculator anymore though. I remember when my dad, a high school chemistry and physics teacher wanted a simple calculator for classes, his first one was around $200 for a very basic unit, and it in early 1970s dollars!
 
Still use my old HP. First scientific calculator was a National Semiconductor with RPN. Knew Terri (about to hot 40 years together) was a keeper when she asked for a calculator when we first were dating. Handed her an HP and she didn't bat an eye, just did her thing and said thank you. A lady that speaks RPN was a rare find!
 
I think I still have my first slide rule somewhere in a desk drawer. I got it in high school but by the time I actually got a job in engineering, calculators were becoming common. Remember RPN? I don't have a HP calculator anymore though. I remember when my dad, a high school chemistry and physics teacher wanted a simple calculator for classes, his first one was around $200 for a very basic unit, and it in early 1970s dollars!
LOL, I bot my first calculator for 156.09$, that was with tax in 1975. That same calculator now would cost about 20$.
 
I do find it interesting that folks are upset about the "Break Room" category going off topic. I have never even noticed that there was such a category. I always just load unread topics which includes all topics and then I read the ones that I am interested in and mark all topics read so everything shown is new. If I am interested in a particular topic I may follow that topic which gives me an email alert.

I think it is fix
I volunteered to moderate for Breakroom too.

The only problem I have found is a political.
That is one thing people have a problem with. One group I on I not a Moderator I tell some group we are
* TEAM AMERICA *
it works this time . The moderate has had step in this year.
So if the word edit here I took out the bad word like ????? Or I am voting for ???? I will replace with I am voting for edit.


I like see everyone having fun.


Dave
 
I do find it interesting that folks are upset about the "Break Room" category going off topic. I have never even noticed that there was such a category. I always just load unread topics which includes all topics and then I read the ones that I am interested in and mark all topics read so everything shown is new. If I am interested in a particular topic I may follow that topic which gives me an email alert.

My on last past some may get wrong idea.
I do moderate all threads here. All moderates here moderate the full website.
I just wanted to be clear

Dave
 
I just love RPN and use a HP35 in the workshop. The trouble is I have never really mastered a "conventional calculator using parenthesis. And yes I still have my slide rules and log tables. Sadly (or maybe not) I can't remember how to use them. This was really brought home to me when I was showing my Grandson how to use a slide rule and he just laughed and did the calculation on his Apple watch - progress - maybe!
Mike
 
I just love RPN and use a HP35 in the workshop. The trouble is I have never really mastered a "conventional calculator using parenthesis. And yes I still have my slide rules and log tables. Sadly (or maybe not) I can't remember how to use them. This was really brought home to me when I was showing my Grandson how to use a slide rule and he just laughed and did the calculation on his Apple watch - progress - maybe!
Mike
Here list wath you can do
Screenshot_20241204-080827_Adobe Acrobat.jpg

Better view on pdf below
 

Attachments

  • Book (1) (2).PDF
    65.7 KB
I used slide rules when I was about 9. Th Teacher asked me how I was doing the sums in class as I was quicker with the answers than I should be. When I showed him a slide rule, he laughed and said it was for Grammar school!
I thought that was stupid.
When I got to grammar school and was about 12, we were taught logarithms. When I was a couple of years older, a teacher explained to me that using the slide rule wasn't as accurate as 4 digit logarithms, but was simply adding and subtracting logs along a mechanical scale..! Only then was I allowed to put in my homework "By slide-rule" when doing calculations to get answers.
Surely teaching YOUNGER kids to use such tools gives them a useful way to do "sums" - and teaches them relationships of calculations much better than simply crashing numbers on the black-board? (Black-boards and chalk are probably a health hazard nowadays too!).
I still use my slide rule in the garage - where my solar powered calculator doesn't work... Handy for working out lengths to angles for tapers, etc. (Quicker and more reliable than doing squares and roots in my head when doing Pythagoras' triangle sums).
Really it doesn't matter what dimensional yard-stick you use in the machine shop. If the engine fits well and runs - That's a great result!
But it is "Fun" for me at least to use "old-fashioned" tools and get good results. Not a crime, just a FASHION, and I applaud those who have chosen to use CNC etc. But mostly it is simply not necessary, IMHO.
Yet when I want music, I use a CD player or digital radio, instead of violin or piano, or singing! The results are MUCH better.
Just enjoy using all the tools and skills you have, and keep making lovely models.
K2
 
On a more serious note - using a slide rule teaches you to estimate the answer in very round numbers which helps you to check that the calculator has given the correct answer. I know the calculator will be correct BUT were the input numbers correctly inserted!
I still like RPN!
 
On a more serious note - using a slide rule teaches you to estimate the answer in very round numbers which helps you to check that the calculator has given the correct answer. I know the calculator will be correct BUT were the input numbers correctly inserted!
I still like RPN!
I generally estimate a number in my head before I reach for a calculator, just to get an idea of a reasonable value that I should expect.
If one relies totally on a calculator, then you may get a wrong number and not even know the value is unreasonable.

.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top