Great !
just a thought, why don't you make a IC engine like that !!?
Two Anwswer:
Answer Number One - The Personal Reason:
Because I tried a Webster once. Apparently I'm the only person on this earth that has tried to build a Webster and failed. I'm usually pretty good with steam engines. I have about a 50% success rate with Stirlings. I'm just intimidated to try another IC engine again given my previous bad result.
Answer Number Two - The Engineer's Reason (yes this is lengthy):
With this gearing set up, the flywheel rotates once or every strokes of the piston. That is the flywheel rotates twice the speed as of a normal engine when based on rotations per piston stroke. In an four stroke engine, you actually want the opposite.
A normal slider crank has the flywheel rotate once for every two strokes of the piston. To activate the valves on the four stroke engine, the camshaft is geared to half the flywheel speed. Therefore on this sun-planet gearing, the camshaft would need slowed to one fourth the flywheel speed.
The atkinson engine actually accomplishes the task of four stokes per flywheel revolution and therefore the cam can be run directly off the crankshaft.
It
is possible to modify this sun-planet gearing to get one crankshaft rotation for every four piston strokes, but it's not entirely straightforward.
The planet gear needs to be one fourth the number of teeth as the sun gear. Therefore if the sun gear is 48 teeth, the planet gear would have 12 teeth. That's all and good, being that the gears don't have the same number of teeth,
the planet gear will want to rotate on its axis. This is bad because then the connecting rod couldn't rigidly attach to the planet gear. There would be two degrees of freedom and the system wouldn't work.
The
solution to this issue is to constrain the planet gear in a ring gear. This removes one degree of freedom and then the system would work.
I know that's a lot to think about. So yes, it can be done, but not without some significant redesign.
Thanks for the inquiry
...Ved.