Hopper,
"The X2 is too small for the motorbike work I do but it seems the X3 is a much more substantial machine that will do more than just small brass model work etc."
It is all in the mind. Almost all machines can be persuaded to do something it wasn't intended to do.
I used to have one of the real crappy Rong Fu mill/drills, but it worked wonders for me because I wouldn't let it dictate what it could or couldn't achieve. I made real tiny high quality parts for a model locomotive manufacturer who required 0.0002" accuracy, to one of the last jobs I did on it.
This is a 7ft long motorcycle chopper frame being converted from shaft drive to belt drive, complete with a rare piccy of 'uncle' John before losing a lot of his body mass. This frame had been dragged around all of the local engineering shops before landing at my feet, they had all said it was too big to get on their machines. My machine did it with 1" clearance to spare.
The chap who owned it was a landscape gardener, and he did a wonderful job of building me a garden wall in payment.
So please, don't think that something is too small without actually doing a lot of research first. It could save you a lot of pennies in the long run.
I am not saying your choice of the X3 was wrong, everyone to his own, but don't discount smaller machines as sort of 'playthings'.
I now run a small bridgy clone (Chester 836), and that can't do half of what I did on that old RF machine, purely because it was a lot more versatile in doing what shouldn't have been done on it, or maybe it is me, not being able to problem solve so readily nowadays.
John