Polish 4 Stroke

[Kaleb]

And this time love again......

I started my searches of generating electric from the oscillatory dynamo I carried which out from the ordinary stepper engine I had which at my "laboratory".

It 's very efficient new dynamo at very low RPM.
I joined the light bulb of 22 volt 0.05 A to one coil of this stepping motor,. Its about 1 Watt,
I joined the bridge rectifier at first to the second coil, and then electrolytic. and next same light bulb (of 22 volt as 0.05 amp) .

diagram :

And I made next video with this experiment.
This view of only energic HALF rotate stepper engine (left , right,left, right) video with to bulbs .One coil have diode and capacitor., another one coil no have.

http://www.new4stroke.com/stepper.wmv


I have this only one my prototype.

Next my propose are only virtual, but in prototype one coil give 1 watt. If in PCB you put 1000 pcs you give about 1 KW ! but constans currend.

Of course this idea need good development.

Why do we have such a low speed performance?
Therefore, the number of teeth in the stepper motor, which cut through the magnetic field is, say 120. that is, in relation to the conventional dynamo about 30 times more frequent cutting of the magnetic field
The other way too. Motors to have a maximum turnover of about 200 rpm;

Regards Andrew ;D

That looks interesting, I might try to make one myself, since it looks ideal for use with steam engines, or your semi-rotative engines.

 

[Feliks]

That looks interesting, I might try to make one myself, since it looks ideal for use with steam engines, or your semi-rotative engines.

Very nice it would be. Just do not forget the pretty pictures on the forum to send.

Regards Andrew

 

[Feliks]

New animations half rotate engine:

And in scale 1:1 350 ccm intake volume:


http://www.new4stroke.com/halfrotatedxf.dxf Save and print file


The cylinder can be made from an aluminum extrude


Big air cooled

Small air cooled

And "Stephenson second"

And story this inventions "step by step"
Story half rotate engine


Save these PDF files on your computer and print. These are drawings of the 2-liter engine on a scale of 1:1


http://www.new4stroke.com/section.pdf

http://www.new4stroke.com/long.pdf

Regards Andrew ;D

 

[Feliks]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ3Pohh502E]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ3Pohh502E[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW1Fedhx6Nc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW1Fedhx6Nc[/ame]

Regards Andrew

 

[Feliks]

Another animation:

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tz2rQvCxp44[/ame]

[/quote]

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/silniki_pomocnicze/sp_index_ang.htm

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/silniki_pomocnicze/remont_sp/awarie_remont/glowica_urw_zaw_isadora/glow_urw_zawor.htm

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/silniki_glowne/sg_index_ang.htm

double bottom fo foam
http://www.youtube.com/user/pawielus?gl=PL&hl=pl#p/u/53/Cfp0BWKwdgY dno


large swimmer:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/user/pawielus?gl=PL&hl=pl#p/u/92/mnxWu3oWghs]http://www.youtube.com/user/pawielus?gl=PL&hl=pl#p/u/92/mnxWu3oWghs[/ame]

Regards Andrew

 

[Feliks]

And about half rotate.

Star engines were characterized biggest always force density

Below picture of the star half rotate around 10 (40) with "cylinders". for the transparency of the picture one can see only 3 additional "cylinders" more than is at the animated film.
One can also see dimensions of the whole of the engine in the assumption that every cylinder has such dimensions for the picture half rotate with the set connecting rod of the Sulzer D= engine of 900 mm and stroke 2500 mm .

So 10 (40) "cylindrical" engine half rotate about the same working capacity in comparing to the Sulzer 10 engine cylindrical on the picture below .

Sulzer: 10 Cylinders 20 m long , 15 m hight , 1500 Ton weight

Half rotate star : 10(40) "Cylinders" 4,5 m diameter , 4,5 m long
about 70 ton weight.

And most importantly.. Since in the engine half rotate mass innertia are several times Sulzer smaller than in the engine, engine half rotate can work with the much greater rotation speed.
Slzer : 102 RPM , 60 000 KW

Half rotate: 250 RPM , 150 000 KW

In same intake work volume ....

Regards Andrew ;D

Sure the engines of cars will be similar proportions..

 

[Feliks]

[quote name='Feliks' post='5125841' date='Jun 24 2011, 15:36']I thought about that. The float on the animation gives the impression of a small..[/quote]

I think that this would be accurate...

http://www.dieselduck.net/videos/04%20weat...ough%20seas.wmv


I wonder how many tons of water would be able to pump out the 100-meter high tank, during one cycle of the wave?

Regards Andrew ;D

 

[Feliks]

The Red Baron Windmill:

Due to the vacuum created by the wing, over which the wind flows, wind turbines in the channels of collective spin vacuum and provide energy....

Here you can see demonstrations of the film that created a vacuum at the top of the wing when the wind blows on him.
The resulting vacuum can suck the ball into the pipe passing through the wing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb8IFfnbjY8

By placing many of the holes on the top of the wing, use the vacuum on the entire surface of the wing. The Assembly shall meet in two sustaining supports and drives the suction fans to them with normal air pressure.
This will of course be used to produce energy,
and its amount will depend on the size of the system...

Regards Andrew ;D

 

[Feliks]

Well, some developing:

Of course, you must use the entire art of loving wing aerodynamics.
And How companies grow one way: speed amplifier in the form of air intake venturi nozzle.

Well, and a new kind of wings...
Venturi nozzle flat... After all the two wings made contrary to each other..

Regards Andrew ;D

 

[Feliks]

In other forum :
[quote name='gruntguru' date='Jul 6 2011, 08:37' post='5147823']
Those wings need endplates.

Seriously - using the flow in a secondary device means that a lot of the wind power is wasted, because the mass flow through the turbines is much less than the wind mass flow captured by the machine.

I have seen some interesting and original ideas in this thread, but you are wasting YOUR energy trying to improve on the efficiency of a modern wind turbine.
[/quote]

All of this, I waste my energy ,you able to understand that there are other, much more efficient ways of using wind energy.

I know your great love for modern wind turbine, but you must remember that any excessive love sent your eyes, and impossible for an objective view of reality.

Besides, is not just about the same efficiency, but also for it to be able to build a very simple structure that even the next 4,000 years will exist. I makes sense to build on the sea, because they almost always wind blows from one direction - from the sea. And so it will probably still over the next 4000 years...
In such a structure may be, for example, 100 such horizontal " flat venturi " and long for 300 meters. Constructed channels will lead to negative pressure turbines which generate much electricity. And the only element consuming to be turbine generators. The rest should survive 4000 years without repairs...

So with these issues will be decisive, not only we can improve the efficiency of Venturi amplifier.

Well unless the people have lost the ability to build such structures ...

And here in a better resolution though you wanted to see more details:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/All_Gizah_Pyramids.jpg

But who will be Pharaoh??

Regards Andrew ;D

 

[Feliks]

And here's the picture of Homer family watching the Red Baron Windmill prototype with flat Venturi nozzles.
If you meet all expectations, this is a prototype of Homer performs with Stone, as Pharaoh himself had wished.
And it will be a very durable building, well, for example, compared to the ridiculously short life of nuclear reactors...

Best Regards Andrew ;D

 

[Feliks]

Concrete is a pile of stones, only a tiny...

If we use the design of computers, calculators to calculate the type,
http://www.flowmeterdirectory.com/flowmeter_venturi_calc.html
http://www.hanleyinnovations.com/vf50.html

It can be 100% clean design
And even more politely 'll gain energy. And then it will be possible, for the next 4000 years.

Andrew ;D

 

[Feliks]

Snoopy inspired me..

First, the architects built the pyramids, then the rectangular houses. Now for the houses in the shape of airfoil :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ak4JgrNPwIc&feature=related


Regards Andrew ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJtYvsDKQV8&NR=1 :

 

[Feliks]

As if someone is not loved music, it can be so..

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdljMhUQWyQ&feature=related]‪Snoopy And The Red Barron (Peanuts)‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]


But you should see that Snoopy House can ...fly

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r9WuQMJ_aM&NR=1]‪ANGEL GUADIANIA Snoopy VS the Red Baron‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]

Andrew ;D ;D

 

[Feliks]

Andrew ;D

 

[Feliks]

Indeed it is

The Multisnoopy Ship

This is Beautiful..

This is the modern variant of a sailing ship... so that the sails are not torn...

Regards Andrew ;D

 

[Feliks]

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/06/downwind-faster-than-the-wind

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/06/downwind-faster-than-the-wind

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNbNNSDljGI&feature=related

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNbNNSDljGI&feature=related[/ame]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPOqlkzW8KU&feature=related

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPOqlkzW8KU&feature=related[/ame]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing_faster_than_the_wind#Sailing_dead_downwind_faster_than_the_wind

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing_faster_than_the_wind#Sailing_dead_downwind_faster_than_the_wind

Aerodynamic coefficient Cx is very small. It is certainly much smaller than in the traditional ship...

This is not a traditional sail 2D, but the full 3D structure. Energy is processed and used to drive water propeller. Why can swim backwards and forwards. Like a film with 2D fan.
So many of Snoopy Ship has a much higher efficiency due to 3D

Andrew ;D

 

[dsquire]

Andrew

I fixed up the tags on the last post for you. Hope that you don't mind. It is very interesting going faster than the wind, I will be reading up on that. :bow: :bow:

Cheers

Don

 

[Feliks]

Ok, OK Many thank Don ;D

Regards Andrew ;D

 

[Feliks]

Old ideas in new study:
This gear drive in a helicopter that is bothering me. Another way to get rid of her. By the way, turned out that the rear propeller and also you can get rid of , because the helicopter does not have the torque of the main propeller.
The helicopter had already been built. But it had drawbacks: no, for example, could not take full advantage of autorotation, because the propeller with a hole through the center did not have good aerodynamic properties....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sud-Ouest_Djinn

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Helicopter_Djinn_rotor_mast_and_blade.jpg
I missed this problem and the propeller is as it is most optimal.
Also today after assuming control of the helicopter adjustable nozzle (vectoring nozzle) on the outlet gases from the turbine driven, will be very precise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbomeca_Palouste

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0e/Engine_of_F-35.jpg
In summary the lack of a gear transmission and rear propeller helicopter will certainly reduce weight.

Andrew