On the fall engine project I am building, I wanted very badly to go to a grease filled needle roller bearing on the big end of the con rod, with no inner race but with a hardened rod journal, and grease seals on the bearing. This would have let me run a dry crankcase. Unfortunately, no one sells 3/8" needle roller bearings with seals now. This means I will probably have to run some lubrication in the crankcase. I'm rather torn about what exactly to do now. The engine will be a slow revving display engine, not run frequently and not run under load. It was designed primarily to see if I could design and build a side valve (flathead) engine from barstock with no castings. My gut instinct is to give the needle bearing a good coat of grease and run it that way. Of course the problem is that with a sealed crankcase there is no way to check and see IF the bearing required more grease at some point in the future. The other option is to put a filler tube on the crankcase and run a very small amount of lube in it for the big end bearing. The small end bearing is also a needle roller bearing, but it is pre greased and does have seals, so I'm not worried about it (It doesn't ever make a full revolution anyways, just rocks back and forth). The wrist pin is hardened. I run a small percentage of oil in my fuel to keep the Viton o-ring on the piston lubricated, so the only real issue is lubricating the big end bearing. I am thinking of running a small amount of really "clingy" oil in the crankcase, something like chainsaw chain oil. Again though, since the crankcase is essentially closed, and I will be running only a small amount of oil in it, it becomes very difficult to monitor the oil level. I am open for suggestions that do not include remaking any parts.---Brian