rklopp
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 393
- Reaction score
- 109
I got the first run on one of six engines I have been building based on Hamilton Upshur's Twin published in Model Engine Builder in 2006.
The engine ran briefly on a prime yesterday before I hooked up the fuel tank, and pretty much fired right up today. That's a testament to Hamilton's design, careful building, and the S/S Machine & Engineering CDI ignitions.
I departed significantly from the magazine plans. Differences include:
(1) The crankcase is hogged from solid rather than built up from plates.
(2) The cam gear cover is integral with the crankcase cover.
(3) The crankshaft is machined from solid with counterweights.
(4) The camshaft is machined from solid, including the gear.
(5) The cylinders are cast iron with shrunk-on aluminum cooling fins.
(6) The heads are larger, and the rocker post attachment is beefed up considerably.
(7) The carburetor is a 3/4-scale version of Jerry Howell's V-twin carburetor.
(8) The flywheel is hogged from solid cast iron, including integral fan blades.
(9) The crankcase breather is based on Jerry Howell's V-twin plans.
(10) The intake manifold is a fancy fabrication instead of hoses per the plans.
One issue that arose is that one of the aluminum fin assemblies did not have enough shrink interference, and moved relative to the iron cylinder liner when the engine got hot. That's a problem, because the head is attached to the fin assembly, so the head drifted away from the engine centerline, carrying the valves and rockers with it. I wondered why the valve lash kept getting looser and looser on that one cylinder. I need to figure out how to re-secure the fin to the liner, perhaps with high-temperature lock-tite, but more likely a few radial pins or "dutch" setscrews.
I have five more of these in nearly the same state of building. The cost of sparkplugs at $25 apiece and ignition modules at $85 apiece is slowing me down! There are two ignition modules per engine.
The engine ran briefly on a prime yesterday before I hooked up the fuel tank, and pretty much fired right up today. That's a testament to Hamilton's design, careful building, and the S/S Machine & Engineering CDI ignitions.
I departed significantly from the magazine plans. Differences include:
(1) The crankcase is hogged from solid rather than built up from plates.
(2) The cam gear cover is integral with the crankcase cover.
(3) The crankshaft is machined from solid with counterweights.
(4) The camshaft is machined from solid, including the gear.
(5) The cylinders are cast iron with shrunk-on aluminum cooling fins.
(6) The heads are larger, and the rocker post attachment is beefed up considerably.
(7) The carburetor is a 3/4-scale version of Jerry Howell's V-twin carburetor.
(8) The flywheel is hogged from solid cast iron, including integral fan blades.
(9) The crankcase breather is based on Jerry Howell's V-twin plans.
(10) The intake manifold is a fancy fabrication instead of hoses per the plans.
One issue that arose is that one of the aluminum fin assemblies did not have enough shrink interference, and moved relative to the iron cylinder liner when the engine got hot. That's a problem, because the head is attached to the fin assembly, so the head drifted away from the engine centerline, carrying the valves and rockers with it. I wondered why the valve lash kept getting looser and looser on that one cylinder. I need to figure out how to re-secure the fin to the liner, perhaps with high-temperature lock-tite, but more likely a few radial pins or "dutch" setscrews.
I have five more of these in nearly the same state of building. The cost of sparkplugs at $25 apiece and ignition modules at $85 apiece is slowing me down! There are two ignition modules per engine.