I grew up in a county whichhas been argued about since 1604. A Welsh bishop and Engish bishop both wanted tithes from Monmouthshire, so both argued and claimed the money! Currently the land is in Wales, but I was born when it was in England. I was in school when it was moved - for the 10th time? - so they decided to find someone to teach us the Welsh National anthem - in Welsh. Only 1 person knew a relative that could speak Welsh, so they got a tape recording and we learnt the Anthem. But now at Wales v anyone Rugby matches, they sing a different version, as I was taught "old" Welsh, not 1970s modernised Welsh!
So why do we try to resurrect "old" languages? Even the English of today is different from the 1950s and 1960s language I learned... 16th century English would be unintelligable to me now....
Of course, where languages have not been erased by history, the current (if radically changed) version is still valid. And it is good to raise children as bi-lingual, as they have a better ability to learn new languages later in life.
K2
In the case of Britain, it is much like any other place,: stamp out a language, suppress a home rule movement. That is very much the same reason it was done in this country. But . . . native languages contained methods--in built in the language--for survival on the hunter gatherer level. Information that is surely lost. However, the pharmaceutical companies would certainly like to have at least one part of that language preserved. When I was a kid (last week) there was a small bush across the road from our house which had little berries in clusters. I asked my dad if we could eat them. No, they were poison. Well, it turned out these berries are related to all those fruits with pits that we know: peaches, cherries and most of all plums. These little fruits have at least three names: June Plum, Indian Plum and Osoberry. Look up Oso berry and you will see it. Turns out to be quite edible and tastes like cantaloupe, of all things.
There are hundreds of fruits and plants and medical stuff if not more that their uses have been lost. All across the Americas, I'm sure this is in the thousands of plants. Don't forget the animals either. You can eat crow if you forget. The thing is, that the Indians would have been assimilated sooner or later anyway without being forced to learn English writing and ways. It is quite the opposite way to do things. We should have taught them writing--yes, but THEIR language. Look what happened with we Cherokees when we learned to read and write Cherokee which ended in TWO trails of tears.
This is an awful chapter of general/president jackson that is quite kept out of the history books. I'm sure you would like to read about Chief Sequoia and what he accomplished and why we were crushed for no good reason.
Languages inherently have methods to thimpfk in different ways. It is impossible to explain to those who know only one language, like what is he taste of the color blue (just joking, explain the colors to a blind person). I could bore you with a couple hundred more pages, but then I's get spanked for being off topic.
Anyway, what's wrong with being taxed by two or three different authorities? We get taxed in this country for everything we do except breathe. They'll figure out a way to tax that too. We get national tax, state tax, county tax, city tax, and because of all that, heart-a-tax.