Hi Chris
I couldn't agree more with Chuck, needs a much bigger bore in the carby.
How did you end up with a 1/32" diameter venturi? There must be an error, surely the full size engine doesn't have just a 1/16" bore in the carby, more like 3/8"-1/2"dia I would think. I wonder what George DeAngelis' drawings show for the carby?
Terminology is important here, I assume we are talking about the main air intake into the engine? If so, your clue is that the engine seems to get enough air when you take the carby off. The Walbro type carbs on power garden tools (and model aircraft engines) have around a 1/4"-5/16" dia venturi, and a built-in fuel pump, maybe you could disguise one in a polished brass housing...
Yes, if Henry was building his engine now, he would have a balance weight on the flywheel. But it
was 1896... In fact he probably wouldn't have both pistons going to TDC together, but he thought having even power pulses was important, hence the massive flywheel to try and smooth things out. BMW got the same result by going to a flat twin. Harley Davidson still don't worry about even firing, thank goodness, that's why they sound so great!
Regards, RossG.
radial1951
_____________[/QUOTE]
Hi Ross,
Attached is the original full-size carb drawn is Solid Works. It is slightly different than the original hand drawings done by George DeAngelis. The carb sits in the intake with a .010" gap all around to allow air to enter the intake with gas. This is what Henry Ford did 120 years ago so when I cut the numbers in half I thought it would work.
Henry Ford did have a counterweight on his Flywheel and I do have the details on it. I did not make one for the half scale but now I am going to.
I took the entire engine apart the other night and cleaned out the cylinder bores, cleaned the spark plugs, inspected the pistons and rings, checked the timing, and took care of air leaks. The engine has a ton of compression and again worked great with a squirt of starter fluid.
This weekend I will try to run it on a constant fuel drip.