- Joined
- Feb 26, 2020
- Messages
- 636
- Reaction score
- 397
This was "racing" quite a bit... but sounded very "right" and no problem whatsoever.
Theoretical feed rate with the 4 mm endmill at 1000 mm/min, and the actual speeds on the machine showed approx. 800mm/min.
The photo shows part from yesterday on the left. With pocket and horrendous number of tool changes.
On the right the part that Jasonb programmed.
Machining time about similar (only for the inside pocket).
Conclusion: This is smoother, probably more process reliable - less tool changes. The adaptive is happy with a "fast machine".
Greetings Timo
p.s. looking at the photo the side wall finish is a tiny bit nicer and less burr on the top, same machine same cutter same material.
Theoretical feed rate with the 4 mm endmill at 1000 mm/min, and the actual speeds on the machine showed approx. 800mm/min.
The photo shows part from yesterday on the left. With pocket and horrendous number of tool changes.
On the right the part that Jasonb programmed.
Machining time about similar (only for the inside pocket).
Conclusion: This is smoother, probably more process reliable - less tool changes. The adaptive is happy with a "fast machine".
Greetings Timo
p.s. looking at the photo the side wall finish is a tiny bit nicer and less burr on the top, same machine same cutter same material.