I have a lathe tool holder which came with TCMT32.51 yellow inserts. Amazon offers these as well as TCMT32.52 Brozen. Not sure what Brozen is but as I read it the 2 at then end is the tip radius. 1=1/64 radius and 2=1/32 radius. Would the larger radius give a smoother cut? My problem with breakage is when facing if the cutter is just slightly above center it tries to jump under the nib it breaks the tip off. Not sure if a larger radius would help that. I know that many of you will tell me that I should buy from better sources but so far I have been happy with the results for the last 2 or 3 years and $2/piece against $20/piece does not seem to be worth it. I am building model engines, not parts for the space station.
Thanks
To answer your specific question, odds are a 322 or 32.52 insert has enough radius to give a good finish. One heads up is that a 32.52 is just a wee bit thicker than a 322, so interchanging them can lead to thinking your tool tip height is good while it is in fact slightly high.
If you mount a nicely ground HSS cutter in the same tool holder, at the correct height, does the problem go away? If so, blame the cheap carbide insert or the tool holder. Otherwise read on and hopefully something will apply...
If the cutter is jumping under the nib I'd suggest getting the tool height dialed in. Minimize overhang of the tool, the more rigid the entire setup the happier the world becomes. You might check for any play or flex in the tool post and compound as well, certain machines like the ubiquitous Chinese sourced 9X20 lathes are notorious for the compound mount flexing. Try to avoid advancing the compound any further than required. The goal is to have a close to a straight line from the cutting tip down through machine rather than air to the carriage, and to have that line within the lathe bed.
I've seen folks with two inches of tool out in the breeze, compound advanced way out in space, machine chattering away no matter what oil or speed / feed they try. Pulling the tool in close to the tool post and the compound back so the tool post is centered over the compound base can work wonders in these cases.
One spot often overlooked is the surface quality of the insert pocket in the tool holder. It must be flat, and the insert should nicely fit. Sometimes a very brief bit of work with a stone will show easily removed high spots. If not flat, the insert can rock or vibrate even with the screw or holding clamp tight. Broken insert to follow.
You might try buying just a couple of name brand inserts once the above is done. Good carbide does cut better and tends to last quite a bit longer. At least you will then know rather than wonder if the lower cost inserts are OK or the source of your problems. Not all cheap carbide is swill, and not all expensive carbide is glorious, but most of the no name import carbide I've seen has been variable in quality. I threw out the 221 "carbide like" inserts that came with some 1/4 inch tool holders from a name brand retailer, while some of Travers house branded stuff years ago was excellent Kyocera made stuff.
Too much material projecting from the chuck or a loose spindle in the head stock can also allow the work to flex and ride up over the insert as you approach center. Work riding up or cutter diving down tends to give the same sort of bad results.
Best of luck with it,
Stan