BaronJ
Grumpy Old Git.
Hi Rob,
Looking at that item, I think I would save my hard earned dosh. You mentioned buying a mill. That amount of money would go a long way towards one, and you would have markedly better performance.
Gee for 580 quid You should be able to buy a small mill
Tin
If it is damp it isn't that cold! Around here it has been so called the snow snaps and cracks when you walk on it. It doesn't even stick to your feet.It's a bit - very cold for an old fart to be in my shed- and very damp as well. So I am having a brain storm as my hand has locked up again, anyway. So let's think a bit, eh?
So some of us need- or could do with a vertical slide. I might well have a mill drill but vertical slides are still really useful. So where do we find one- and importantly, free gratis and not a lot?
This is what I've done on my 9x20 to use an AXA style tool post. It makes for a very stable tool post for on a machine with known wimpy compound. I actually posted pictures someplace on this forum. Of course this means the compound normally sits off the lathe, this could be an issue.Well, that thing that is officially called a top slide can be detached from its place on the saddle and rotated 90 degrees- if only a square block of metal was fasted to it- and to the saddle.
Knocks daft prices for something that may not be wanted really where it is. With a bit more lateral thinking, those QCTP things that everyone raves about( 'cept me) could be fitted to the saddle- with a spacer to replace the top slide.
Comments please- on a Five pound note!
Norman
There's an interesting story about an American called Jeffrey Hamilton.If it is damp it isn't that cold! Around here it has been so called the snow snaps and cracks when you walk on it. It doesn't even stick to your feet.
I agree. I don't think it was listed correctly.
Frankly, you might get away with it but, in what I can see, I'd have driven your attachment on the saddle using the leadscrew. If you truncate your triangle of forces, your pressure exerted is not in line using the tailstock. Consequently, you are putting unnecessary strains on the underneath of the saddle- and marginally lifting it.
Again, if you follow my reasoning, you are doing exactly the same with the tailstock configuration.
Now having said all this, there is no reason why smaller things are not driven from the tailstock using a tailstock pad. Quite simply, the stresses and strains are far less.
My take, others may have different views. Mine are these very old fashioned triangles of forces from Euclid and Pythagoras- a couple of ancient old farts- like me.
Cheers
Norman
Enter your email address to join: