- Joined
- Oct 1, 2010
- Messages
- 1,395
- Reaction score
- 425
bazmak,
I'm following this thread and I have a 7x lathe. I have had to address this problem at least twice.
I can also say that I was originally plagued by gib screws continually working loose, which has also been mentioned by many owners of these lathes. Better-quality screws and nuts and sometimes new tapped holes are needed.
I am conservative when it comes to modifications. I start slowly and work up to "better" a step at a time and things really do get there in the end.
Back to the problem in hand: I don't have the measurements to hand, but my lathe's problem is that the measurements vary depending on the distance along the bed (14-inches in my case). It appears to "belly" near the tailstock end, like the lathe here:
http://madmodder.net/index.php?topic=627.0
(Too bad the photos have been moved)
In addition, the serial number stamping distorted the bed in that area.
My next major effort at improvement will be an attempt to totally disassemble the lathe and attempt to actually determine whether the bed can be improved by scraping, maybe even grinding, but this may end up proving I need a new bed.
Meanwhile, things with this lathe are OK enough for my present operations that I can do well in my usual work envelope near the headstock: I only have to worry if I would want to turn a long length between centers, which I seldom need to do.
So, I originally made a part like yours and that was good enough for about a year. The next iteration included a remake of both sides, lapping and shimming: Better. If I can determine the bed is workable or end up with a new bed, then I will probably go the tapered-gib route.
If you haven't read this, also see here:
http://www.homemodelenginemachinist.com/showthread.php?t=8306&highlight=Beginning+Mini-lathe
I can also recommend the Connolly book. Not used every day, but worth having to see what would be done in a perfect world (circa 1954). It is a good idea to get the whole theory down, otherwise it is possible to "correct" via a compensation that creates another need for a compensation-for-the-compensation further down the road.
I have been following your various projects and I have no doubt you will do something and I will be watching whatever you post on this.
--ShopShoe
I'm following this thread and I have a 7x lathe. I have had to address this problem at least twice.
I can also say that I was originally plagued by gib screws continually working loose, which has also been mentioned by many owners of these lathes. Better-quality screws and nuts and sometimes new tapped holes are needed.
I am conservative when it comes to modifications. I start slowly and work up to "better" a step at a time and things really do get there in the end.
Back to the problem in hand: I don't have the measurements to hand, but my lathe's problem is that the measurements vary depending on the distance along the bed (14-inches in my case). It appears to "belly" near the tailstock end, like the lathe here:
http://madmodder.net/index.php?topic=627.0
(Too bad the photos have been moved)
In addition, the serial number stamping distorted the bed in that area.
My next major effort at improvement will be an attempt to totally disassemble the lathe and attempt to actually determine whether the bed can be improved by scraping, maybe even grinding, but this may end up proving I need a new bed.
Meanwhile, things with this lathe are OK enough for my present operations that I can do well in my usual work envelope near the headstock: I only have to worry if I would want to turn a long length between centers, which I seldom need to do.
So, I originally made a part like yours and that was good enough for about a year. The next iteration included a remake of both sides, lapping and shimming: Better. If I can determine the bed is workable or end up with a new bed, then I will probably go the tapered-gib route.
If you haven't read this, also see here:
http://www.homemodelenginemachinist.com/showthread.php?t=8306&highlight=Beginning+Mini-lathe
I can also recommend the Connolly book. Not used every day, but worth having to see what would be done in a perfect world (circa 1954). It is a good idea to get the whole theory down, otherwise it is possible to "correct" via a compensation that creates another need for a compensation-for-the-compensation further down the road.
I have been following your various projects and I have no doubt you will do something and I will be watching whatever you post on this.
--ShopShoe