Imagine two buildings, one behind the other. The DSL connection and the wireless router that provides the network's WAP are in building 2 in an office on the far side away from building 1. The wireless signal therefore has to pass completely through building 2 and across the intervening space to get to building 1, at which point it barely registers and is not reliable.
To fix that, I want to try moving the WAP from the office to the side of building 2 that is closer to building 1 and seeing if that's enough to boost the signal strength in building 1 sufficiently.
Is it possible to put two WAPs on the same LAN in a non-complicated way and without losing line speed?
If that can't be done, do you see any problem with turning off the WAP in the wireless router in the office, running a cable to the other side of the building, and connecting another wireless router with its WAP enabled?
Is there any functional difference between a dedicated WAP-only box and the WAP built into a wireless router? Dedicated WAPs seem to cost as much or more than wireless routers that have greater functionality, which has me puzzled.
The problem seems tailor-made for a wireless repeater, but my understanding is that they are half-duplex and I don't want to take the performance hit.
To fix that, I want to try moving the WAP from the office to the side of building 2 that is closer to building 1 and seeing if that's enough to boost the signal strength in building 1 sufficiently.
Is it possible to put two WAPs on the same LAN in a non-complicated way and without losing line speed?
If that can't be done, do you see any problem with turning off the WAP in the wireless router in the office, running a cable to the other side of the building, and connecting another wireless router with its WAP enabled?
Is there any functional difference between a dedicated WAP-only box and the WAP built into a wireless router? Dedicated WAPs seem to cost as much or more than wireless routers that have greater functionality, which has me puzzled.
The problem seems tailor-made for a wireless repeater, but my understanding is that they are half-duplex and I don't want to take the performance hit.