I was disappointed with the soft compression, entirely my fault, just machined the piston a tad too close to final finish to be able to get a good surface on it at the size I was aiming for and ended up .2 thou smaller than intended. When I measured it after disassembly and after the running it had, it was in fact .5 thou smaller than intended.
So it was either make a new piston or "cherry bomb" this one. Decided on the latter, nothing ventured-nothing gained. First heating no growth. Second heating a delicious 1 thou growth. Made a mandrell and pushed the piston onto it and then linished it as before. Took it down to the 572.2 size finished I was aiming for in the first place. It looked a treat.
Reassembled the engine and as I had hoped, the engine would not turn over but the piston did enter the bore to a bit more than 1/2 stroke. Plenty of light oil and then with a prop on worked it back and forth for about a couple of minutes, each time it went just that bit further. Not too hard as the conrod and gudgeon and crankpin are all being a bit stressed whilst this process goes on.
Eventually the engine went full circle, very tight, but that is exactly what is required. I never cease to be amazed how an engine will start and run with so much tightness .
So on to the test bed, fuel and flicking. A few pops then a few rotations, then a few more then away. Maybe not quite so quickly as this sounds but it didn't take too long.
First run just let it burble away at low comp for about 3 minutes, with a bit of a tweak right at the end. Let cool down 100% then another 3 minutes and a tweak at the end gave 8600 on the 9 x 4 wood Turnigy prop I have always used for comparisons. Totally cooled and 3rd run starting to tweak it often even a little leaner, although that indicated where I had it was about right, this time just got to 9,000 again about 3-4 minutes. 4th and last run tweaked it for max and got 9,060 initially, backed off next tweak 9100, backed off next tweak saw 9250. I then backed off the comp and let it run at about 5500 and then it ran out of fuel. So after about 12 -15 minutes it is showing some wonderful signs.
A) Good power.
B) Getting better with each run.
C) Easy to start, just suck a little fuel through the spraybar and flick.
4) Compression - fantastic - as good as it gets cold or hot.
5) Vibration certainly within the low to average range.
6) Never made any black in the exhaust, so materials must be happy.
So there we have it - an engine that would probably be the equal of a good sport 2.5cc from the 50s or 60s that can be built by the Home Machinist and hoping to inspire budding designers to have a go at their own design.
Time now to put the CAD plans on here.
A bit about me. I think my first flick of a diesel engine was about age 12, it was a Taipan red head possibly a Mk5 if I remember correctly, that was the only diesel I had as a kid. I must profess that I am a new-comer to playing around with building model diesel engines, and have only scratched the surface of what knowledge those involved in the Motor Boys camp have. But I enjoy using my mill and lathe immensely and that is where all this started a few years ago when I built my first engine the BollAero 18. The Holly Buddy is the 15th one built and I guess it won't be the last.
Again I would like to mention Steve Jenkinson who has so kindly worked these CAD plans from my rudimentary drawings into easy to follow and a joy to use plans of the engine.
And as you will see I have dedicated this design and build to the memory of a terrific fellow aeromodeler, David Owen.