Dave, I think you took my words the wrong way, and it wasn't meant to infer you were doing anything wrong.
I was just explaining the way things work. Unfortunately nothing is written in stone, and everyone has the right to withdraw or let lapse any of their photos, or even going in and deleting their own posts, including the pics in the articles stored on site.
Even Rick can't guarantee that all the photos will be there forever, and what is to stop the site you put up going belly up sometime in the future?
All I am saying is, that by using a dedicated picture hosting site and a dedicated video site, the posts do look better and make things more logical to understand when everything is embedded. Plus by people not minding paying a little out of their own pocket (which I will be doing very soon with my photobucket account), they can take a lot of the storage pressure off, not only this site, but any other site that they use.
I personally use a lot of pics in my posts, maybe sometimes too many, but if I tried to use site storage, with the limit of four pics, then my posts just couldn't be done, because they would be so disjointed, and split into so many parts, that they would be very difficult for me to post them and anyone to understand them, and I suppose a lot more people who do embed, wouldn't be able to do their great write ups as well.
The way I look at it for myself, for passing over a quickie bit of info, such as a sketch or a small PDF, then yes, I do use onsite storage, but for everything else, I sort my own storage and embed whatever and however many into the post.
Blogs