TonyM your question got me to thinking that I have the perfect engine to compare different compression ratios in the same engine.
I used an online calculator and this shows my original design with the piston at TDC and being 0.500 below the end of the cylinder.
I then removed the piston and rod and shortened the rod by 0.225 so now I have a gap of 0.725 from the top of the piston to the end of the cylinder.
This is the result.
I was hoping to see a slower idle speed but I did not. The engine was harder to start and was more touchy to carb settings.
I have since reverted back to the original settings.
Thanks for looking
Ray
I used an online calculator and this shows my original design with the piston at TDC and being 0.500 below the end of the cylinder.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/506f7/506f7419f4fa069a45c2e636020e965c9df60fa6" alt="Original Length.jpg Original Length.jpg"
I then removed the piston and rod and shortened the rod by 0.225 so now I have a gap of 0.725 from the top of the piston to the end of the cylinder.
This is the result.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62e5a/62e5a5aa47845f5663daa872a46be5a5efaeea92" alt="Shorten Rod 0.225.jpg Shorten Rod 0.225.jpg"
I was hoping to see a slower idle speed but I did not. The engine was harder to start and was more touchy to carb settings.
I have since reverted back to the original settings.
Thanks for looking
Ray