Have posted something under "Another ML Midge" in the work in progress forum about a possible design anomaly. However the questions I ask are a bit lost there so have started this thread in the hope that those answers might be considered.
The quote below from there is self - explanatory ... however to cover it briefly .... I found that the piston comes down below the inlet port hole by a few thou and maybe this is why the engine lacks some power.
In the plans it is designed for a 4 thou opening - just wondering if this is normal practice - my thoughts are it would not be ...
Presently making a new conrod .015" longer to see if there is any improvement in power.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Well the Midge was finished some time ago and has now had about 2 hours running.
I must say I was a little disappointed with it, as although the fits are very good, it is a trifle cantankerous not wanting to start easily on anything smaller than 8 x 4 props and it is down a full 1000 revs on a DC Merlin on the same prop at 6000 versus 5000.
Now I know a sideport won't give the same power as an advanced timed rotary port - but I thought it should do better than this - and as I am 80% finished a Veron Cardinal just for this motor - I feel that it will be very marginal on power.
Another intriqing thing it has is that it wants to bite badly on tying to start on small props and I use a chicken stick as a result. It also has little suction and will actually spit out any prime from the venturi instead of sucking it in ! Clearly not good for performance when its trying to trying to throw the incoming fuel/air mixture back out the venturi.
So this morning I took the inlet venturi off and with a stong torch checked what the piston was doing at tdc - well maybe I found the cause of all these little problems. The piston was uncovering the inlet by about 10 thou as best I can judge. Obviously any uncovering of the inlet will allow residual exhaust pressure to escape down the venturi reducing inlet flow and thereby reducing power. It also has this very annoying habit of oscillating back and forth, rather than rotate when trying to start.
So I went back to the drawing to see what the specs were, and I think that maybe the problem is in the original design - unless it was meant to be this way.
I would welcome any comments pro or con ...
The way I see it is this - at BDC
Centreline Crankshaft to datum land on cylinder (all in inches) 0.906
Conrod length 0.787 plus piston above 0.197 = 0.984 less 1/2 crank rotation 0.200
therefor top of piston is 0.784 above CS centreline
The inlet hole is 0.157 below datum and 0.078 diameter so top of hole is 0.118 below datum or
0.788 above CS centreline
So therefore the piston uncovers the inlet by 0.004 according to the drawings as far as I can see - and if a small error occurs in maching to these tolerances then it can "fix" the problem or exacerbate it.
Over to the boffins now - do you think that this would rob the engine of some power?
Also ... if I made a new conrod say 10 thou longer - would this help ? I know it will throw out the timing but what I lose in timing might that be made up for by better inlet tract flow?
The quote below from there is self - explanatory ... however to cover it briefly .... I found that the piston comes down below the inlet port hole by a few thou and maybe this is why the engine lacks some power.
In the plans it is designed for a 4 thou opening - just wondering if this is normal practice - my thoughts are it would not be ...
Presently making a new conrod .015" longer to see if there is any improvement in power.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Well the Midge was finished some time ago and has now had about 2 hours running.
I must say I was a little disappointed with it, as although the fits are very good, it is a trifle cantankerous not wanting to start easily on anything smaller than 8 x 4 props and it is down a full 1000 revs on a DC Merlin on the same prop at 6000 versus 5000.
Now I know a sideport won't give the same power as an advanced timed rotary port - but I thought it should do better than this - and as I am 80% finished a Veron Cardinal just for this motor - I feel that it will be very marginal on power.
Another intriqing thing it has is that it wants to bite badly on tying to start on small props and I use a chicken stick as a result. It also has little suction and will actually spit out any prime from the venturi instead of sucking it in ! Clearly not good for performance when its trying to trying to throw the incoming fuel/air mixture back out the venturi.
So this morning I took the inlet venturi off and with a stong torch checked what the piston was doing at tdc - well maybe I found the cause of all these little problems. The piston was uncovering the inlet by about 10 thou as best I can judge. Obviously any uncovering of the inlet will allow residual exhaust pressure to escape down the venturi reducing inlet flow and thereby reducing power. It also has this very annoying habit of oscillating back and forth, rather than rotate when trying to start.
So I went back to the drawing to see what the specs were, and I think that maybe the problem is in the original design - unless it was meant to be this way.
I would welcome any comments pro or con ...
The way I see it is this - at BDC
Centreline Crankshaft to datum land on cylinder (all in inches) 0.906
Conrod length 0.787 plus piston above 0.197 = 0.984 less 1/2 crank rotation 0.200
therefor top of piston is 0.784 above CS centreline
The inlet hole is 0.157 below datum and 0.078 diameter so top of hole is 0.118 below datum or
0.788 above CS centreline
So therefore the piston uncovers the inlet by 0.004 according to the drawings as far as I can see - and if a small error occurs in maching to these tolerances then it can "fix" the problem or exacerbate it.
Over to the boffins now - do you think that this would rob the engine of some power?
Also ... if I made a new conrod say 10 thou longer - would this help ? I know it will throw out the timing but what I lose in timing might that be made up for by better inlet tract flow?