Tin Falcon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2007
- Messages
- 7,207
- Reaction score
- 789
Alex et al:
A few real basic rules for scaling. Linear measurement is directly proportional. Areas are proportional to the square and volume is cubed. So as an example if you start with an engine of 1/2" bore the new diameter of the bore is 1" . But the same amount of air or steam pressure exerts 4 times the force on the piston. It will produce 8 times the power and consume 8 times the air or steam and use 8 times the material by volume therefore mass or weight. Potentially it could be 8 times the material cost.
Now if we go the other direction and make it half size the bore becomes 1/4"
the force exerted on the piston is 1/4 of the the original engine . the power air /steam consumption volume and weight will be one 1 /8 th of the original.
Also keep in mind that the smaller the engine the more important fit and finish between moving parts. This become a concern. A higher percentage of the power is used to overcome friction and there is less usable power left over.
For a first engine 1/2" to 3/4" is a good size it is more likely to run the first time without a lot of run in.
Yes my first engine completed was 1/4 bore the second 3/8 bore that is before I knew better.
Scaling can be helpful in converting metric to English, Like I mentioned above to increase the size of an engine by making 1 " = 32 MM instead of 24.5 conversely making an engine approx 3/4 scale makes it easy to go from metric to English measure make 1mm = 1/32 of an inch . 1 mm is really 1/25.4 or if you want to scale it up make 1 mm =1/16. by scaling up approx 1-1/2 times So this type of scaling makes the numbers come out even
Tin
A few real basic rules for scaling. Linear measurement is directly proportional. Areas are proportional to the square and volume is cubed. So as an example if you start with an engine of 1/2" bore the new diameter of the bore is 1" . But the same amount of air or steam pressure exerts 4 times the force on the piston. It will produce 8 times the power and consume 8 times the air or steam and use 8 times the material by volume therefore mass or weight. Potentially it could be 8 times the material cost.
Now if we go the other direction and make it half size the bore becomes 1/4"
the force exerted on the piston is 1/4 of the the original engine . the power air /steam consumption volume and weight will be one 1 /8 th of the original.
Also keep in mind that the smaller the engine the more important fit and finish between moving parts. This become a concern. A higher percentage of the power is used to overcome friction and there is less usable power left over.
For a first engine 1/2" to 3/4" is a good size it is more likely to run the first time without a lot of run in.
Yes my first engine completed was 1/4 bore the second 3/8 bore that is before I knew better.
Scaling can be helpful in converting metric to English, Like I mentioned above to increase the size of an engine by making 1 " = 32 MM instead of 24.5 conversely making an engine approx 3/4 scale makes it easy to go from metric to English measure make 1mm = 1/32 of an inch . 1 mm is really 1/25.4 or if you want to scale it up make 1 mm =1/16. by scaling up approx 1-1/2 times So this type of scaling makes the numbers come out even
Tin