It's worth noting that modern automotive diesels are partly operating on the second cycle. Premixed combustion is preferred because it produces less pollution, but longer mixing times produce a more violent initial combustion so a trade-off has to be made. That's also why compression ratios of automotive diesels have trended downwards, Mazda makes one with a compression ratio of only 14:1. Lower compression ratio allows a greater proportion of the fuel to be vapourised before ignition, without creating huge pressure spikes that would be noisy and might damage the engine.Some interesting and useful points in this thread. On that seems to have been missed is the problem of ignition delay and controlled rate of combustion. This is affected by the fuel itself, the atomisation from the injector and the air swirl/turbulence.
Diesels first trial with the injection of petroleum (I translate this as paraffin or kerosene) resulted in an uncontrolled combustion and the destruction or the indicator mounted on the cylinder head. This was the source of the commentary about the engine exploding. Diesel tried many different atomisation systems and finally settled on the air blast to produce the first successful commercial diesel engine. There were many other versions of solid injection developed but it was the Bosch system that became commercially successful.
For the ideal diesel cycle the fuel should ignite almost instantaneously when it is injected into the compressed heated air and continue to burn in a controlled manner during the rest of the injection period. This is fairly easy to obtain in a large low speed marine or stationary engine. These typically have very limited air turbulence and rely on the atomisation from the injector nozzle. For smaller higher speed engines there is much less time available for intimate mixing of the fuel and air and a vigorous amount of swirl/turbulence is required. This was originally achieved using a pre or swirl chamber where the air was compressed through a small passage into a separate chamber with the fuel injector. This required less atomisation from the injector but had greater heat losses resulting in lower thermal efficiency and harder starting.
If some fuel is dropped on a surface heated above the self-ignition temperature it will vaporise and ignite, but probable not quickly enough for an engine.
A number of working model diesels have been made, some may achieve close to the diesel cycle, others may operate in a different cycle where the fuel is injected very early in the compressing stroke so it has time to vaporise before the ignition temperature is reached. It can be difficult to tell but if the injection timing is more than 10- 15° advance it is probably on the second cycle.
My first 20cc two stroke diesel did run but I think it was actually running on the fuel that was blown past the piston.
There's a third 'diesel' cycle too: the MAN M-system, where fuel is injected onto the surface of a deep bowl in the piston, and evaporates as rapidly swirling air passes over it. Combustion occurs in a 'sheet' covering the inside of the bowl. M-system engines can run smoothly on fuel with very long ignition delay (like petrol) because they mostly avoid having a premixing phase between injection and ignition, so there is no big pressure spike and injection can be timed very early. But efficiency and pollution are worse.
Describing how to make an injector or injection pump is quite difficult so I don’t think Find Hansen is being difficult. At an amateur level it is not possible to measure and tolerance the various dimensions. I think I am achieving clearances of a few microns on a 2mm bore but can’t confirm that. My judgment of when a pin gauge will just enter a bore may be different to someone else’s. The angle of the poppet/mushroom valve on Hansen's injector is also difficult to measure. I guess that he knows how to set up his machines to achieve a working system but it will be different for others.
I have made some working injectors of this type. The cone angle is important, if it is too acute it will self-lock and if too obtuse the spray will hit the combustion chamber walls. The angle is initially set with the top slide on the lathe but deflections will make the actual angle different. Polishing the cone after hardening will change the angle again. Minh has also made this type of injector and I am sure has his own way of setting the angles etc.
Something I'd like to explore at some point is methods for making injection pumps that don't require such minuscule clearances. I think the plunger could be sealed using a stuffing box packed with telfon rings, in which case the clearances could be pretty loose while still sealing well. However control of timing and duration would have to be like Find Hansen and Minh's pumps where the stroke is varied by changing the tappet clearances, which does have the unfortunate side effect that start of injection is later at lower fuel delivery quantities.