digiex-chris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2010
- Messages
- 263
- Reaction score
- 58
3d CAD is amazing sometimes, but sometimes it makes me start from unreasonable assumptions which then makes me question my math. Right now, it's throwing off my estimation skills by being so far out of the ballpark I must have messed up with my calculator.
I can easily determine the differences in volume between the piston at TDC with the valves closed, and BDC with the valves closed. The volume of the air gap at TDC is 0.021 cubic inches, and at BDC it's .807 cubic inches.
0.807/0.021 = 38.42 as a ratio.
Is that a good definition of compression ratio in 4 stroke? If so, I wasted a lot of time trying to make things not hit other things while minimizing gap. I'm kinda happy about that because I would have spent 3 years making that piston ;D
I can easily determine the differences in volume between the piston at TDC with the valves closed, and BDC with the valves closed. The volume of the air gap at TDC is 0.021 cubic inches, and at BDC it's .807 cubic inches.
0.807/0.021 = 38.42 as a ratio.
Is that a good definition of compression ratio in 4 stroke? If so, I wasted a lot of time trying to make things not hit other things while minimizing gap. I'm kinda happy about that because I would have spent 3 years making that piston ;D