Stuart Beam Engine Piston Rings

Home Model Engine Machinist Forum

Help Support Home Model Engine Machinist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
127
Reaction score
77
Location
Sun Valley, California
It's time to put the piston in my beam engine cylinder. My casting kit is the old style matching the construction book by Andrew Smith; in it he refers to a parting tool to 'machine the (piston) packing groove'. However, I have 1" cast iron rings in my hardware kit, and the current Stuart design uses an O'ring in an 1/8" wide x 3/32" deep groove.

In the "How Slow Can You Go" thread: https://www.homemodelenginemachinist.com/threads/how-slow-can-you-go.2050/page-2#post-50628
there seems to be a running comment that iron piston rings provide more drag and thus prohibit running the engine at a slow rate. This being a beam engine, slow is the desired speed.

What's the consensus on piston sealing: packing, cast iron ring or O'ring? I plan to run this on steam as well as on air...

John
 
Anybody have a drawing of the Stuart Beam Engine piston with cast iron rings? The Andrew Smith book (and I assume the original Stuart plans) used packing. The current Stuart plans call for using an O-ring. My casting kit came with two 1" OD rings, 0.0625" wide and 0.0440" wall. Thinking my kit was somewhere in between. Would rather use iron rings than the O-rings. Were both rings used or one with a spare?

Should I use a two piece piston to avoid expanding the ring over the OD?

Any thoughts or insights?

John
 
I have a vintage Stuart Beam engine I run it many many hours at shows on air ~3psi slow.
I have also run it on steam for short periods . I use 1 VITON O ring. adjust your piston
groove depth until you get a very low friction , but sealing fit. Nicely polished cylinder.
I also use Viton for some I.C. engines. Work fine . The vintage plans show 1 ring.
 
I have been told that the very best thing for piston rings is a plastic called peek.
I haven't tried it because it is insanely expensive but it is reportedly very low friction and very good resistance to heat.
 
Yes, I see a 1" bar of the stuff is about $ 60 per foot ( McMaster-Carr )

For now I've worked out the groove dimensions for the iron rings (which I have). I've gapped them in the bore about 0.006", they are 0.0625" wide and 0.045" thick. I've got a 0.006" groove side clearance and about 0.005" back clearance. Now if I can refrain from breaking them getting them in the grooves!

John
 
Back
Top