I'll go one step farther, it seems enormously flexible and looks like it could be very useful for all of us. Useful on many kinds of model engine.
Would this work on a v-8 (hall effect)?I was thinking after reading several posts here and on other web sites; “what is the very simplest ignition board that I can come up with that can be used by points, Hall-Effect, and inductive pickups and have adjustable dwell so it can be used with different coils”. So I came up with this below and see attachments.
Simplest Sparky:
Any comments?
RayView attachment 128053View attachment 128054
thank youJust glancing at it, I like it. It's clear, concise, flexible and well documented! Just stating the obvious -
Thank you, that was my intentions.I'll go one step farther, it seems enormously flexible and looks like it could be very useful for all of us. Useful on many kinds of model engine.
Are you talking about the Hall-effect that GM uses with it's window dizzy? If so, I don't see why not so long as the signal-in meets the voltage requirement.Would this work on a v-8 (hall effect)?
No, a model V-8 Think Lil Demon V-8.Are you talking about the Hall-effect that GM uses with it's window dizzy? If so, I don't see why not so long as the signal-in meets the voltage requirement.
- The CD4047B needs an input signal of at least 3.5 volts when running on 5 volts. 7 volt input signal when running on 10 volts and 11 volt input when running on 15 volts. This would be either positive or negative going.
Ray
Your right I missed that one my bad. I'll fix it up.Ray:
LED1 is never going to light
The voltage at the base of the transistor will never go above 0.7v. The led will require at least a couple of volts. Unless you have something going on with a negative supply at VSS (-) on the led cathode? But I don't see it on the schematic.
I haven't chosen a PNP yet but as I stated in the write up I still have testing to do and will let people know what I find. Including the parts I have tested.Ray:
If you simply choose to use the Q(not) output of the chip (instead of the Q output) the transistor (and coil) will be energized most of the time instead of off most of the time. (sort of an inverted dwell scenerio). That's going to be an awful load on the transistor and coil and a waste of power for no reason. Maybe I'm not getting your reason for that option.
Yup, my software wants to sequentially number everything a PITA. I can make things like part 1.1, 1.2 etc. so I'm just going to delete the part reference and use a text box.Ray:
You show an option for an IGBT transistor for Q2. I don't see a Q2 in the schematic. Same for TR2.
I assume they are replacements for Q1 and TR1?
TR1(2) being ignition coils I assume.
Yes but how are you going to direct the spark? are you going to use a dizzy? A crank trigger?No, a model V-8 Think Lil Demon V-8.
Yes but how are you going to direct the spark? are you going to use a dizzy? A crank trigger?
On my race car I'm going to use both a crank trigger to fire and a dizzy to distribute spark at first. From this I while end up using a shift register to use coil near plug and 8 coils along with a Ford 302 cam sensor.
Ray
LOL I'm trying.Ray:
Q1 only has a dc current gain (hfe) of 8 at 5 amps collector current. Therefore it's going to require about 600ma of base drive current to properly drive the coil.
The CD4047 at best will supply only 6ma. You're going to need at least a couple of pre-drive transistors.
And BTW. You can't drive the coil high with a PNP transistor. It will require a base voltage higher than the supply to turn on properly.
How about this:
As you suggested. Go back and re-design your circuit, test it thoroughly and THEN present it. And make us a video of it working.
That's not what I'm trying to accomplish here. What I'm trying to show is the problems one would encounter if they tried to make an ignition on their own with using basic tools like just a multi-meter. I could very easily simulate a circuit using a spice program and get very close to a fully working ignition. If people here want to see that then I could do that also. But what would they learn? Advanced skills? I like this web site because there are people who show their trials and tribulations as they learn to create things from metal, working engines. There are also master machinist here with more knowledge of machining metal than I could possibly learn on my own. I believe "it's not the destination that matters, it's the journey that matters". Show me a completed engine and what did I learn, nothing, what did someone teach me, nothing.Ray:
How about this:
As you suggested. Go back and re-design your circuit, test it thoroughly and THEN present it. And make us a video of it working.
Basically it means that the current leads the voltage in a purely inductive circuit by 90 degrees.
Thank youThanks for all that ray. I will need to read it a few more times before it sinks in. Thanks for posting. Much appreciated.
Yup, thanks for pointing that out and I will correct. More on this below.I'm sure it's just a typo but, that's backwards.... Current lags voltage by 90deg in a purely Inductive circuit. Current leads voltage in a purely capacitive circuit...
Enter your email address to join: