A compilation video journal of my model engine building experiance the past 5 yrs. (2006-2011) [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTS-fcqWpj8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTS-fcqWpj8[/ame]
....I have probally seen the same web site as Stirling is more popular in Europe. Many of the models you witnessed are one offs based on the artistry of the builder. I have done a couple with a single view photo posted by these craftsman as I know the internal arrangements. I find that Stirling is forgivable and liberal in design parameters. On a Stirling forum I'm with there are always questions regarding volumes, diameters, acceptable leakage and clearances. Many potential builders get lost in the math of Stirling, afraid of being off by .060inch in something unfamiliar. You can't go wrong by starting with two cylinders of the same volumes and simular strokes. Troubleshooting Stirling revolves around two issues: leaks and mechanical friction. The ease of Stirling is taking two cylinders and joining their internals to a flywheel. How you do this on your platform is the creative part of modelling! Little did Robert Stirling, its inventor, as he saw his moderate commercial success overidden by steam powered devices, see how wonderful his engine became as future tabletop models! Dave.lazylathe said:Thanks Dave!
You are an inspiration to us all!
One last question:
I have seen a lot of Stirling engines on a German site that they seem to build without any plans.
They have either seen a similar one on youtube or ey have an old picture of one they are going to copy.
With this in mind do you need to do any special calculations for the volumes, piston diameter, displacer size etc in order to ensure they will run correctly?
Andrew
Enter your email address to join: