This is a video of my first radial engine running. For the complete build log, this is the link.
http://www.homemodelenginemachinist.com/index.php?topic=6305.0
Brians Radial Engine running
- Thread starter Brian Rupnow
- Start date
Help Support Home Model Engine Machinist Forum:
This is a video of my first radial engine running. For the complete build log, this is the link.
http://www.homemodelenginemachinist.com/index.php?topic=6305.0
Rolland
Well-Known Member
Well Brian you did it again, :bow: that is a marvelous engine. I like it. But you have to stop this I need to get some other things done. I will never catch up now.
Brian
What a wonderful adaptation to a classic design which you have expanded upon and brought to a very interesting conclusion.
This will be an inspiration to new builders showing what can be achieved from a simple concept.
Well done and I look forward to more of your personal projects
Phil
What a wonderful adaptation to a classic design which you have expanded upon and brought to a very interesting conclusion.
This will be an inspiration to new builders showing what can be achieved from a simple concept.
Well done and I look forward to more of your personal projects
Phil
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2008
- Messages
- 971
- Reaction score
- 9
Congratulations. Nice engine. Nice build. And entertaining as always! :bow:
Jerry
Jerry
Chuck--I would like to do an article for another magazine, as this is a rather fascinating engine, and a well documented build---but---I haven't been asked, and I'm not sure to go about selling an article to a magazine. The beam engine was easy---I had posted it over on the HSM website, and George Bullis seen it there and asked me to do the article..cfellows said:
black85vette
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2009
- Messages
- 1,084
- Reaction score
- 25
I didn't do a lot of them but I wrote some articles for electronics service related publications and also for sound system engineering. I wrote to the editors and gave a list of articles I was planning to see if they were interested or if I could go another direction for something they needed. Got several jobs that way. Pay was not great but worth the effort. Also looked at doing a technical book but did not get any bites on that.
I think you ought to do more of it. You design some cool stuff, your drawings are great and your writing is easy to follow. Not everyone can do all of that.
I think you ought to do more of it. You design some cool stuff, your drawings are great and your writing is easy to follow. Not everyone can do all of that.
I've done the same thing for some other magazines-- send the editor an e-mail saying "Would you like an article on <this cool thing / project>?" Send a photo or one paragraph summary if it's not something they'll already know what it is. Some may dismiss it out of hand, some may want to see the entire article before passing judgment and some will say "sure, send it over".
After a while of that they'll be pestering you for articles.
After a while of that they'll be pestering you for articles.
I may have spoken too soon. I was contacted this morning by a magazine wanting to do an article on this engine. Can't say who it is though untill its published.---Brian
Chuck---Ya just never know where its going to come from, do ya!!! I kinda like my old career, if this damned awfull economy ever sorts itself out!!! I enjoy doing the magazine articles, but I see it as perhaps being something I do when I retire. And I really, really don't want that to happen for a couple of years yet, at least.cfellows said:
Since I AM doing a magazine article on this engine, I cleaned up the drawing of the main star shaped frame and put it on 3 sheets to make it a bit easier to read.---Brian
View attachment MAIN SUPPORT FRAME DETAILS-BRIANS RADIAL ENGINE.PDF
View attachment MAIN SUPPORT FRAME DETAILS-BRIANS RADIAL ENGINE.PDF
Hello Mr. Rupnow. I don't know if this is an active thread.
I am a teacher who teaches CNC machining (manual programming, CNC machining and MasterCAM) in a trade school in Montreal, Canada (school name : Cente Anjou, see : www.cspi.qc.ca/centre-anjou/). We have about 15 CNC machines (milling and lathes) and three of our new machines have CNC rotary tables. We also have three CMM machines for accurately inspecting all the parts.
I am looking for a real cool project for my students and I would like to do your radial engine (AKA Brian's Radial Engine). What I really like about your engine is that there are no really small fragile parts and the engine parts would be easy to machine on our CNC machines. I would like to know if you would give me permission to use your radial engine as a project for my students.
If so, I would like to ask you a couple of questions.
CONROD HUB : After studying your drawings for quite a while, I would like to know if I have understood the mechanism properly. If the master Conrod is silver soldered to the Conrod Hub, that means that it never pivots (just thinking to myself !). If I understand correctly, the other Conrods are also fixed and do not pivot because they are fixed with Loctite. Is this correct? If this is correct, the only reason the engine can rotate is because the Cylinders pivot and the Conrod Hub probably rocks slightly back and forth for each revelation of the Crank ? Or is the the Loctite just to lock the small 1/8 inch rod that holds the end of the Conrod pin in place ?
If so . . . . I was thinking of doing a modification. If the above paragraph is correct, could I replace the Conrod Hub with a solid pentagon hub (with no groove) and drill and tap 5-40 at the correct spot on each face. The Conrods could then be simple threaded rods. Or am I missing something ?
When I first looked at the plans I was sure that the other Conrods (other than the master one) had to pivot in the Conrod Hub or they would break.
CYLINDER : I always buy Machinist's Workshop and Home Shop Machinist (that's how I found your engine !). So, after reading your explanation on page 26 of the Jan/Feb issue of Home Shop Machinist, I had a question regarding the path of the airflow in the engine. By the way, I took the liberty of changing the Air Inlet to an NPT pneumatic fitting (so my students can practice tapping NPT). I can follow the airflow path, starting from the side of the Vertical Stand, up into the circular annulus, into the (5 arm) Main Support Frame (via its own circular annulus), up the length of the arm and out the hole on the face of the arm. After that I presume it is the rocking action of the Cylinder that permits the air to enter into the top of the cylinder, pushes the Piston down and when the cycle is finished, the cylinder rocks (pivots) the other way (as the piston rises in the cylinder), letting the air exit by the other hole that goes completely through the arm. Is this correct ?
NOTE : I am using MasterCAMx7 to do all my drawings (production drawings, solids, etc) and to generate the G-codes to machine the parts. If you give me permission to do this project, I will keep you posted on my progress. I am attaching a screen grab of my progress so far.
Other modifications :
I will also be adding a small SHCS, screwed into the back of the flywheel so the student can rotate the engine manually and thus show off the interesting movement of the mechanism.
![20130422_185710[1].jpg](https://cdn.imagearchive.com/homemodelenginemachinist/data/attach/24/24608-20130422-185710-1-.jpg "20130422_185710[1].jpg")
![20130930_222917[1].jpg](https://cdn.imagearchive.com/homemodelenginemachinist/data/attach/24/24609-20130930-222917-1-.jpg "20130930_222917[1].jpg")
![Challenger_-_Ready_to_go[1].jpg](https://cdn.imagearchive.com/homemodelenginemachinist/data/attach/24/24610-Challenger---Ready-to-go-1-.jpg "Challenger_-_Ready_to_go[1].jpg")
I am a teacher who teaches CNC machining (manual programming, CNC machining and MasterCAM) in a trade school in Montreal, Canada (school name : Cente Anjou, see : www.cspi.qc.ca/centre-anjou/). We have about 15 CNC machines (milling and lathes) and three of our new machines have CNC rotary tables. We also have three CMM machines for accurately inspecting all the parts.
I am looking for a real cool project for my students and I would like to do your radial engine (AKA Brian's Radial Engine). What I really like about your engine is that there are no really small fragile parts and the engine parts would be easy to machine on our CNC machines. I would like to know if you would give me permission to use your radial engine as a project for my students.
If so, I would like to ask you a couple of questions.
CONROD HUB : After studying your drawings for quite a while, I would like to know if I have understood the mechanism properly. If the master Conrod is silver soldered to the Conrod Hub, that means that it never pivots (just thinking to myself !). If I understand correctly, the other Conrods are also fixed and do not pivot because they are fixed with Loctite. Is this correct? If this is correct, the only reason the engine can rotate is because the Cylinders pivot and the Conrod Hub probably rocks slightly back and forth for each revelation of the Crank ? Or is the the Loctite just to lock the small 1/8 inch rod that holds the end of the Conrod pin in place ?
If so . . . . I was thinking of doing a modification. If the above paragraph is correct, could I replace the Conrod Hub with a solid pentagon hub (with no groove) and drill and tap 5-40 at the correct spot on each face. The Conrods could then be simple threaded rods. Or am I missing something ?
When I first looked at the plans I was sure that the other Conrods (other than the master one) had to pivot in the Conrod Hub or they would break.
CYLINDER : I always buy Machinist's Workshop and Home Shop Machinist (that's how I found your engine !). So, after reading your explanation on page 26 of the Jan/Feb issue of Home Shop Machinist, I had a question regarding the path of the airflow in the engine. By the way, I took the liberty of changing the Air Inlet to an NPT pneumatic fitting (so my students can practice tapping NPT). I can follow the airflow path, starting from the side of the Vertical Stand, up into the circular annulus, into the (5 arm) Main Support Frame (via its own circular annulus), up the length of the arm and out the hole on the face of the arm. After that I presume it is the rocking action of the Cylinder that permits the air to enter into the top of the cylinder, pushes the Piston down and when the cycle is finished, the cylinder rocks (pivots) the other way (as the piston rises in the cylinder), letting the air exit by the other hole that goes completely through the arm. Is this correct ?
NOTE : I am using MasterCAMx7 to do all my drawings (production drawings, solids, etc) and to generate the G-codes to machine the parts. If you give me permission to do this project, I will keep you posted on my progress. I am attaching a screen grab of my progress so far.
Other modifications :
I will also be adding a small SHCS, screwed into the back of the flywheel so the student can rotate the engine manually and thus show off the interesting movement of the mechanism.
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Messages
- 597
- Reaction score
- 704
If I may, I'll answer the part I can:
conrods: only the master rod is fixed to the hub, the others do pivot. That is a common feature on radials. The one rod is fixed to limit the angle that the hub will rotate - without one being fixed the hub can rotate too far and jam up. I think he just loctited the pins at the end of the rods so they would not come out of the hub.
conrods: only the master rod is fixed to the hub, the others do pivot. That is a common feature on radials. The one rod is fixed to limit the angle that the hub will rotate - without one being fixed the hub can rotate too far and jam up. I think he just loctited the pins at the end of the rods so they would not come out of the hub.
Similar threads
